Israeli authorities screened footage of Hamas’s October 7 atrocities to Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg and other pro-Palestinian flotilla participants upon their arrival in Ashdod on Monday, shortly after the IDF intercepted their ship, the Madleen, in international waters.

According to Defense Minister Israel Katz, the activists refused to continue watching the film after seeing the brutality of the attacks.

"These antisemitic flotilla activists closed their eyes to the truth and once again proved they prefer the murderers over the victims,” Katz said. “They continue to ignore the atrocities committed by Hamas against Jewish and Israeli women, the elderly, and children.”

The activists were given the option to sign a voluntary departure form or face arrest after 96 hours. Among those refusing to leave is French MEP Rima Hassan.

Hassan has previously drawn wide criticism for her denial that the Bibas family, excluding Yarden Bibas, were murdered, her claim that the October 7 massacre was “legitimate” and her insistence that Palestinians in Europe should be allowed to join the “resistance.”

  • piskertariot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    ·
    12 days ago

    Peaceful protestor held at gunpoint refuses to watch violent propaganda.

    As such, branded as hypocrite.

    Modern politics.

    • gorikan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Delivering baby formula to certain people seen specifically as a form of protest by all media.

      Modern politics.

  • ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Is no one going to say or do anything about the fact that Israel illegally “intercepted” another ship in international waters?

    Also arrested for what? They weren’t even under Israeli jurisdiction when picked up.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      All legal under the letter of international law pertaining to military engagement. That it is in international waters is irrelevant legally speaking. See the legal grounds for the sinking of Belgrano for a clearer example. As long as they can think of a halfway credible excuse that they think the vessel will cause aid to their enemy, they have the right to interdict it in international waters.

      • ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        12 days ago

        The Belgrano was a military ship, this one isn’t. So even if you’re right regarding military vessels, I doubt the same would hold for a civil one.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Distinction isn’t made. A civilian ship could be conducting or supporting military operations (see Q ships, zelensky’s “civilian” container trucks etc).

          As with many things, it basically comes down to who has the bigger gun. Until a naval power pulls its finger out and starts escorting relief ships, Israel is at liberty to seize them.

      • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 days ago

        Which halfway credible evidence do they have? They have none. The blockade is illegal so intercepting it is illegal too

    • JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      At leat in A Clockwork Orange the point of the footage wasn’t to try to persuade them that violence is good.

  • teagrrl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    There’s no footage from October 7th that comes close to what happens in Gaza every fucking day.

  • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    "These antisemitic flotilla activists closed their eyes to the truth and once again proved they prefer the murderers over the victims,” Katz said. “They continue to ignore the atrocities committed by Hamas against Jewish and Israeli women, the elderly, and children.”

    Not gonna believe this hasbara rag unless they show unedited video of the flotilla participants not watching the tapes. And likewise for everything else in the article. 💩

  • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Do they think the floridly theatrical condescension makes them look like the good guys here?

  • SomeLemmyUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    “Lost its radio signal” As if we didn’t have footage of them jamming

    “Blockade to avoid weapon delivery”

    “Ship carrying humanitarian aid”

    “These antisemitic flotilla”

    "The IDF prepared in advance to intercept the ship before it could enter Israeli territorial waters; "

    Enough said

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    12 days ago

    "These antisemitic flotilla activists closed their eyes to the truth and once again proved they prefer the murderers over the victims,” Katz said. “They continue to ignore the atrocities committed by Hamas against Jewish and Israeli women, the elderly, and children.”

    They refused to watch videos of atrocities that aren’t part of the videos, such as the murders of babies (unfounded) and mass sexual violence (unfounded). They must hate Jews. They certainly aren’t protesting the genocide of Palestinians. It can’t be that. /s

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    This unlawful attempt at forced brainwashing is truly scandalous and absolutely intolerable with its repugnant double standards.

    No one disputes that the terrorist attack by Hamas was brutal.

    Nevertheless, this by no means justifies the genocide being committed by Israel. There are also horrific images of this, of starving children, cold blooded murder of civilians and unbearable suffering - and Israel is even using every means at its disposal to prevent the world from seeing the full extent of their own atrocities.

    If Israel were to adhere even remotely to international law and human rights, Thunberg would not be there.

    It is absurd that this country continues to portray itself as the victim. They are the perpetrators and responsible for crimes against humanity.

    These savages who represent Israel are truly the scum of the earth.

  • Thebigguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Isreal knew Oct 7 was coming.

    Source: I know this sounds crazy but trust me

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      They did, it has been proven beyond any doubt because they openly admitted it. They also willfully ignored warnings from military officials. Also the pager operation was already in progress months before Oct 7 so they were planning all out war with the whole region for a while.

      • Thebigguy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Yep, they also purposefully moved the festival closer to Gaza. The organisers is known to have Mossad connections

  • Bouzou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 days ago

    “Yeah, I agree, that is horrible. I am literally just trying to keep more innocent people from suffering and dying…”

  • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Are the Jewish nazis trying to guilt trip them into helping their genocide? Before you even say anything what’s the difference between a free range cage and a cage? The comfort level of the animal. A lot easier to gun down when you say it’s safe here

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      what’s the difference between a free range cage and a cage? The comfort level of the animal.

      I think you are making a rhetorical point unrelated to animal welfare, but in point of fact, “free range” hens do not enjoy a meaningfully greater level of comfort. The only way to reduce these suffering of exploited vulnerable individuals is not to pay for their exploitation in the first place.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      12 days ago

      I’m assuming everyone here is smart enough to recognize and filter out the propaganda.

      What is left is Israelis boasting about their own war crimes.