• stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    8 days ago

    Lights are one of the areas where I think automation is genuinely useful, but my rule with anything “Smart” is that it has to be able to run 100% locally.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 days ago

      It also needs to fail gracefully. A smart switch needs to fail to a dumb switch, not “no switch”.

      • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        and retire gracefully, where the device becomes open source and available to the community of owners who have invested in it.

      • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        You’re absolutely correct. I have few smart switches around the house and automations for yard lights and stuff like that are pretty nice to have but I still have the physical switch where the dumb switch was to interact with if the automations are down or I just want to override them. The ones I use even accept the same faceplate than traditional ones so there’s no change on anything unless you want to automate things.