Maxwell, sentenced to 20 years for sex trafficking, says 2007 plea deal negotiated by Epstein should have protected her

Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted sex trafficker and associate of Jeffrey Epstein, has requested that the US supreme court overturn her conviction, saying she was unjustly prosecuted.

In 2022, Maxwell was sentenced in Manhattan to 20 years in prison for sex trafficking and other related crimes. Her legal team, however, submitted a request to the supreme court on Monday, seeking to overturn the lower court’s decision, arguing that a prior plea deal that Epstein took protected Maxwell from prosecution.

Maxwell’s submission to the supreme court comes days after she met justice department officials, as discussions began to see whether she would turn into a US government cooperator. Observers have suggested Maxwell may be able to expose new information about Epstein’s sex trafficking and the wealthy individuals who may have also been involved. It is not clear if Maxwell will become a US government cooperator and what she may receive in return.

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It’s not even “I didn’t do it”, it’s literally “I think I should have gotten away with it”.

    • smokestack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve seen this guy lie his dick off for ten years, but not as childishly as he has for the past two weeks, as if his mother caught him stealing cookies. He’s in complete panic mode. He can barely hit a golf ball properly, let alone rape a child, anymore.

    • socialsecurity@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Correct but the legal argument is literally legal since that “plea deal” is a “legal” document and the executive is…

  • Luouth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    So the white box had the script in it for all this? Makes sense now. Evidently, Trump wants to move the limelight over to some of his buddies on the list and has literally given Maxwell a get out of jail free card so as to not to mention his name on that list. And getting the Supreme Court to do the dirty work in a ‘constructive’ (or constructed) way means Trump can distance himself from a Presidential pardon.

    “…Oh, and by the way, Israel, you better let all that aid in to Gaza and stop being so mean”

    • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think if you do what she did for as long as she did, there’s no real coming back from it.

      Except at the Supreme Court, of course.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Apparently Epstein entered into a plea deal that may or may not have extended to co conspirators, named or otherwise. Very odd situation. Maxwell was not part of the plea deal but is arguing that she was a coconspirator and therefore the deal applies to her.

    Supreme Court needs to rule that plea deals can only affect people that physically entered into them.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Pretty sure the plea deal wouldn’t have covered future crimes, either. Not like of you plea out of a speeding ticket you just get to speed for the rest of your life without legal consequences.

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        The basis of the argument is because she is covered under the plea deal her arrest was unconstitutional. Pretty batshit crazy if you ask me.

        • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Right, but that can only apply to crimes comitted before the 2007 plea deal. If she was charged for literally anything comitted in the following decade, then that is still valid.