As Texas Republicans try to muscle a rare mid-decade redistricting bill through the Legislature to help Republicans gain seats in Congress – at President Donald Trump’s request – residents in Austin, the state capital, could find themselves sharing a district with rural Texans more than 300 miles away.

The proposed map chops up Central Texas’ 37th Congressional District, which is currently represented by Democrat Rep. Lloyd Doggett, will be consumed by four neighboring districts, three of which Republicans now hold.

One of those portions of the Austin-area district was drawn to be part of the 11th District that Republican Rep. August Pfluger represents, which stretches into rural Ector County, about 20 miles away from the New Mexico border.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      5 days ago

      The pretense is gone now though, which is fascinating. And scary.

      It’s literally just partisan warfare with legal exploitation, and voter bases apparently think it’s justified. I mean, what are they gonna do, side with the other party over it?

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        They always forget that the laws they pass to punish their enemies or enrich themselves goes both ways.

        If they start acting like the law is anything they can get away with without going to jail, then the same can apply to the rest of us.

    • iridebikes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Federal government won’t do anything about it. States control their own elections and therein lies the conundrum. Texas is proving very willingly that it doesn’t care about the rules as long as they win.

    • Dagwood_Sanwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      5 days ago

      Over a century. It all started with the Democratic Republican Party that eventually became the Democratic Party.

      • greygore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 days ago

        It started in 1812. Although the Democratic-Republican party did evolve into the current Democratic party over the course of two centuries, it’s hardly fair to call them the same party. That’s eight generations between then and now and the political landscape has changed dramatically.

        As for the “both sides do it” whataboutism, like so many “both sides” issues the current Republican Party benefits far more from gerrymandering than the current Democratic Party, and this is before this especially egregious Texas mid-census redistricting.

        • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s such a silly and disingenuous argument. The most recent version of gerrymandering arguably began with REDMAP in 2010, which was in response to Obama winning. Before that, it was used almost exclusively to disenfranchise black voters before the voting rights act in 1965. Before that, it was used by both parties in unison to maintain the supremacy of incumbents.