afk_strats@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agoInspired by a Lemmy postlemmy.worldimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1692arrow-down16
arrow-up1686arrow-down1imageInspired by a Lemmy postlemmy.worldafk_strats@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squareDr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·9 days agoThose look like 3.5" drives.
minus-squareSapphironZA@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-29 days agoFront loading bays though. Most 3.5 inch drives go in top loading bays. Do they looking like modern 3.5inch drives, or older ones?
minus-squareDr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 days agoThere are a number of chassis that have front loading 3.5" bays. I have one at home. Looking at the pic, each chassis looks to be 3U. I’d bet money those are 3.5".
minus-squareSapphironZA@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 days agoWhat I meant, is that they are not commonly used anymore, because of how expensive rackspace and power has become in commercial settings.
Those look like 3.5" drives.
Front loading bays though. Most 3.5 inch drives go in top loading bays. Do they looking like modern 3.5inch drives, or older ones?
There are a number of chassis that have front loading 3.5" bays. I have one at home.
Looking at the pic, each chassis looks to be 3U. I’d bet money those are 3.5".
What I meant, is that they are not commonly used anymore, because of how expensive rackspace and power has become in commercial settings.