Pro@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 9 天前Rustprogramming.devimagemessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1810arrow-down141
arrow-up1769arrow-down1imageRustprogramming.devPro@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 9 天前message-square71fedilink
minus-squareCroquette@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·8 天前I interface with low level communication protocols, mostly uart, so it fits my use case. But it is nice to see the hurdles people encounters. It tells a lot about the language.
minus-squarebrucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-28 天前Yeah. I wasn’t trying to imply it’s a bad language at all; it just fits certain use cases. They are complex, like people. Still, it seems like it’d be cool for engine work, with C# or maybe a subset of typed Python as a scripting language.
I interface with low level communication protocols, mostly uart, so it fits my use case. But it is nice to see the hurdles people encounters. It tells a lot about the language.
Yeah. I wasn’t trying to imply it’s a bad language at all; it just fits certain use cases. They are complex, like people.
Still, it seems like it’d be cool for engine work, with C# or maybe a subset of typed Python as a scripting language.