ekZepp@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoVintagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square194fedilinkarrow-up11.09Karrow-down112
arrow-up11.08Karrow-down1imageVintagelemmy.worldekZepp@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square194fedilink
minus-squaredarkreader2636@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up3·24 hours agoIBM sure made naming pretty confusing aren’t they?
minus-squarethe_crotch@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up13·edit-222 hours agoPs/2 ports predated the PlayStation 2 by years. Sony made naming confusing in this case.
minus-squareAwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·21 hours agoHow can ports of a game predate the platform itself? That makes zero sense. (/s)
minus-squareRogueJello@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·18 hours agoNot really? I mean it was a whole thing. OS/2, PS/2, I think maybe some PC/2? I can’t remember. Anyway it was all branded together.
minus-squaredosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 hours agomissed opportunity for the mainframes to be “system/2” and not “system/360”
IBM sure made naming pretty confusing aren’t they?
Ps/2 ports predated the PlayStation 2 by years. Sony made naming confusing in this case.
How can ports of a game predate the platform itself? That makes zero sense.
(/s)
Not really? I mean it was a whole thing. OS/2, PS/2, I think maybe some PC/2? I can’t remember. Anyway it was all branded together.
missed opportunity for the mainframes to be “system/2” and not “system/360”