• naught@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m just thinking about the “take home” figure! 160k doesn’t stretch as far as I thought it did when I was a kid

    • tomkatt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I thought $40k was more than enough when I was a kid. But that was when you could buy a house for $30k to $50k. By the time I hit my 20s, inflation already had homes at closer to $100k, and the cost of everything much higher than when I was a kid.

      When I was growing up I didn’t know anyone making more than $50k, most made less, and they were doing fine, owning homes, etc. $160k was wealthy.