themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoThis CEO laid off nearly 80% of his staff because they refused to adopt AI fast enough. 2 years later, he says he’d do it againfortune.comexternal-linkmessage-square64fedilinkarrow-up1411arrow-down121
arrow-up1390arrow-down1external-linkThis CEO laid off nearly 80% of his staff because they refused to adopt AI fast enough. 2 years later, he says he’d do it againfortune.comthemachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square64fedilink
minus-squareMysteriousSophon21@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·4 months agoTechnical staff were skeptical because they actually know what AI can and can’t do reliably in production environments - it’s good at generating content but terrible at logical reasoning and mission-critical tasks that require consistancy.
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·4 months agoSo it’s the CEO they should replace.
minus-squareEnd-Stage-Ligma@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-24 months ago it’s good at generating content but terrible at logical reasoning and mission-critical tasks that require consistency. Thank goodness nobody is crusading to have AI take over medicine.
Technical staff were skeptical because they actually know what AI can and can’t do reliably in production environments - it’s good at generating content but terrible at logical reasoning and mission-critical tasks that require consistancy.
So it’s the CEO they should replace.
Thank goodness nobody is crusading to have AI take over medicine.