• Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    random people having this kind of influence on international conflicts because they have a lot of money is good and healthy and okay

      • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        This but kind of unironically, him doing this makes it much more likely the US government will blow some of its military budget to fund some sort of competitor.

      • anewbeginning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        If Musk doesn’t learn to play ball, the us government might well take control of the tech for the remainder of the war. Geopolitics is the game that is played with all the pieces.

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is behaviour that gets you killed. Musk may be rich, but not “weapons manufacturer” or “oil magnate” powerful.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    “One of the advantages is the huge amount of innovation coming out of the private sector, which the government wants to leverage to stay ahead of China and others,” said Brian Weeden, the director of program planning at the Secure World Foundation, a think tank.

    Well if the government had invested in its space and innovation programs they wouldn’t have to rely on the private sector.

    • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Honestly I’m kind of glad that they didn’t. Imagine if the US government had even more control and surveillance potential over the internet. I know they already basically have 100% but, I dunno, a network of low-Earth-orbit satellites constantly hovering overhead, covering every square centimetre of the earth, is a bit scary.

      • IronCorgi@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t think the same network in the hands of an unstable billionaire is an improvement. Given the choice I’d rather the U.S. have control of the network.

          • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I think this one is much easier to look at if I restate the choice:

            "A single individual billionaire who has only his self interest in mind has control over the internet "

            vs.

            “An organization consisting of more than one person, who are voted to power, who must hold their own interests in mind as well as their doners at minimum”

            Personally, even if it’s a whole bunch of different billionaires fighting for power, the government ultimately has to answer to more than one person. That makes it an inherently better choice.

            • Takatakatakatakatak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              Which government? Do you imagine that the vast network of live-feed surveillance satellites run by the various arms of the US intelligence services and military is under the slightest control of the elected government?

    • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’m guessing that as a supervillain (as @bionicjoey@lemmy.ca pointed out), Musk expects the CIA and NSA to have nice thick dossiers on him. Since Musk has Putin on speed dial, the KGB probably shares their file and asks him for updates.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      In this case, he got on the KGB’s “thank you and we’ll send you some flowers, luvya ❤️” list

    • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t think Ukraine has the resources to create, deploy, and operate its own satellite Internet network.

      • frostwhitewolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Surely the US has a satellite network they clould be making use off? Maybe there’s political reasons why they cant be given access.

        • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          The US does have its own satellite network, but it’s unlikely they’d let anyone else use it, even allies, because of the risk of leaking information, or even because it would let other people derive more information about its capabilities and limits.

    • StudioLE@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      There are certainly more secure options but better is unlikely given how revolutionary starlink is.

    • Accuaro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I mean… that’s what the government, more so the political self interest in those of power wanted. Funding for NASA reduced and that easily could have done what SpaceX has accomplished, to pandering and almost begging Elon to get things done.

      The system is beautiful.

  • popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    People have a lot of family over there. A lot of folks are really upset.

    I wonder how much more before people have an extreme reaction to him personally.

  • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    All Musk has to do to answer this is to say outages occur in satellite networks all the time. But, I’ll suppose he’ll remain silent until someone charges him with something. Would be nice to have a witness on this stupid SOB

  • OttoVonNoob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Cut those juicy government assets and seize StarNet. The US military dumped money in and now it conflicts with national security.