NASA, with the tampons.

  • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I just wish I saw more Star Wars references but not that bootleg Disney crap, I like my star wars like I like my bands in the EU.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      As a purist, we can agree that the only real series was TNG, this was the cornerstone, built on the hallowed but kind of silly ground made by the original series, but followed by DS9 when we grew up a little, and we can kinda accept Voyager was a thing that happened somewhere in the distance but we don’t get too close.

      There was nothing else. The franchise ended and we all moved on, happy for the good run. “ALL GOOD THINGS…”

      • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        A purist would know that it’s not Star Trek if Kirk, Spock, and McCoy are not present. We don’t need French men with English accents or William T. Ripoff!

      • atomic@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        wtf is a Star Trek “purist” and why should anyone care about your arbitrary opinion?

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          why should anyone care about your arbitrary opinion

          By this metric, what’s the point of even browsing any forums or websites at all? Everything is someone’s arbitrary opinion, if it makes you feel bad to read something you disagree with, you can’t fix that outside of yourself.

          • atomic@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            I love that your response to what a “star trek purist” is is a defense of bs opinions on the internet

            • ameancow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              My actual response to someone so cynical and unable to relax and banter about hobbies and fandoms is to block them. Bye.

            • NiHaDuncan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I guess you missed the part where he quoted the exact part of your comment that he was replying to. Or do you just want to ignore that part so you don’t have to defend it?