• Let's Go 2 the Mall! ❌👑@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    I hope they lose billions on this deal. I know I’m only going with AMD now. It’s not much, but I do buy all the tech for my company. Servers, laptops, etc… will all be AMD going forward.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Literally illegal. Only AMD and Intel have the patent cross-licensing rights to make x86 chips. There used to be a third company (Cyrix and subsequently VIA), and (maybe?) still is, but it hasn’t been relevant to the desktop CPU market in decades.

        The real competition will come from ARM-based computers.

        • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          10 days ago

          We don’t need competition in the x86 space, we need competition in the mobile/desktop/server space. That could easily be performance competitive ARM or RISC-v or whatever. Better even with diversity of design.

          • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            Enterprise ARM servers exist, I’ve used them, they’re neat.

            With a proper stack you don’t even notice they’re arm

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Competitor is already here. Apple and Ampere are making ARM systems that fit most users needs. There are ARM servers. But people don’t want to switch.

        • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Apple doesn’t really exist as a competitor for a number of industries and use cases due to not officially supporting anything other than OSX so I’m not sure if they’re a fair comparison here.

          The only real edge they have is in non-gaming related consumer workloads.

          • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            They do fine with content creation. Windows 11 has been such a bear many are moving back, and the m-series mac mini is a surprisingly capable little box that’s not offensively priced.

            Asahi Linux has made fantastic progress too. It’s really just bare metal windows that’s a problem anymore on these and nobody wants windows anymore anyways. It’s just what they have. Outside of gaming it’s largely unnesscarry to use windows in 2025.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          No. AMD is fabless; TSMC doesn’t design chips. They’re in different parts of the supply chain.

          In fact, AMD is a customer of TSMC.

    • killerscene@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      intel must still be hanging on purely based on corporate computers? or is there something else they are a large part of?

      this just be in my bubble, but i feel like anyone i know over the last 15 years has been exclusively getting AMD, whether theyre tech savvy or just a regular consumer.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Athlon64 x2s fucking dominated Pentiums back in the mid 2000s, but the market for people playing games was much smaller. Only with the i-series did Intel come back on top. Ryzen was great when it came out for budget gaming, but Intel still was supreme in perforce until the Ryzen 3D processors came out.

          • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            the person above said:

            anyone i know over the last 15 years has been exclusively getting AMD

            that is 100% nonsense. as stated above even today intel is still outselling AMD 2:1 in the PC market.

            • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 days ago

              Oh I agree with you, but in my experience the people i know have predominately gone AMD as well. When I bought my 9900k, Reddit was HEAVILY downvoting any Intel support and upvoting AMD support. It doesn’t reflect the market, it I do see that in social trends.

              …that said, while my 9900k still kicks ass, I am never going Intel again after recent news hahaha

              • Archer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 days ago

                All that bullshit where they didn’t immediately recall their processors with hardware issues put me off Intel indefinitely

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Defense contracting.

        They do a a good amount of of military industrial contracting and work for 3 letter agencies on data processing/ high performance computing.

        They also got awarded government funding in 2024 to build logic chips for the military in-country.

        Not enough to sustain the company, but such “sensitive” programs may not be allowed to show up in revenue reports or have to be assigned to other areas or so.