• MaxAmperage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s been a big effort to block anybody with a blue checkmark since any major story or viral post will have them automatically bumped up to the top of the replies. So, when the whiners started complaining, he started openly considering this.

    • 💡dim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      He will end up “compromising”.

      You can block people, but only people without blue check marks.

      Wanna harass someone, wanna be a troll, subscribe to Twitter blue and you can’t be blocked…

      • sensibilidades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aren’t there different twitter tiers, too? Like, blue and gold? I wonder if you’ll only be allowed to block people in your tier and below, so that unpaid accounts can’t block anybody

        • sgtlighttree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          IIRC the gold checkmarks are reserved for big corporate accounts that want it, and Twitter demands $1000/mo for that. Incredible.

            • Archpawn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Honestly, I don’t think that’s a problem. Twitter always got its money from people paying to show you stuff you didn’t want to see. So what if the ads are now tweets?