Which of those countries had a military capable of fighting back the Nazis but chose not to? Only one, let’s see if ml can find it.
Can’t tell if this is anti USSR and Pro Russia, or Pro Ukraine and pro USSR. I’m hoping it’s the latter but I just can’t tell.
No one show this to this the dnc is perfect and can in no way improve, why yes I think anyone to the left of Hillary is a tankie user
Jesus Christ
oh hey that’s the jerk that called me a Trump supporter for refusing to back Newsom after all the anti-trans shit he agreed with Charlie Kirk about on his podcast.
It’s possible to hate a country and also be forced to capitulate to it (or die trying to resist, if you don’t have a family that you care about).
Once again, Sweden’s good PR helps them dodge a shot.
it seems that hasbara is worth it; isreali or not.
“Ok so now it’s legitimate to invade these countries!”
Average tankie.
Average lib.
This is a nice completion to the post however I am not sur it is related to my comment.
Your comment is a person that only lives in your head. It’s a strawman
Except we came exactly to that point with Cowbee. Who, I am thankful, was open to dialog, unlike you with your short unrelated or straight made up comments.
Removed by mod
Which is the end goal of communists, but you can’t really have a stateless society until all or nearly all countries are socialist unless you’re going the anarchist route.
Removed by mod
There’s some historical examples where that may have been the case but that’s not some universal constant that can’t be changed.
Fundamentally they both want the same thing in the end so disagreements on how you get there can be resolved. If 2 different areas/groups try 2 different paths there’s no reason they can’t work together where mutually beneficial.
Would people have to get over being too overly dogmatic about their way? Yes and that may be difficult but not impossible.
71·2 days agoFundamentally they both want the same thing in the end
I don’t think that is entirely true. Marxist and Anarchist have different analyses and therefore come to different conclusions.
Yeah if you’re getting very into the weeds on it Is there some minor difference between how that classless/stateless society operates?
Sure but most of the difference in analysis and conclusions is on how to arrive at the classless/stateless society.
The differences between the vision of classless/stateless societies communists and anarchists have is minor compared to pretty much any other broad 2 political ideologies have as what visions of the perfect society is.
Removed by mod
Cuba has sent doctors and other medical support to countries of many different ideologies. They would 100% assist an anarchist group if asked and it’s something they could provide.
Currently China and Vietnam are both willing to trade with countries of any ideology.
You’re latching on to a couple examples in the past and saying nothing else can happen besides that. If that’s going to be the extent of your argument no point in continuing this since there’s nothing left to talk about then.
Removed by mod
That thought terminating cliche doesn’t even make sense in this context
