• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Chicago has 2.6 million people. This number of accidental deaths is 0.0042% of the population.

    They scored a grade of 99.9958 on this test. Is reducing the accident rate even a realistic target? There are always going to be some incidents that you can’t prevent, some circumstances that you can’t predict.

    I’m not saying the safety effort shouldn’t be made, but 0 is not a realistic target in the real world. You can always try to address edge cases, but you can’t actually eliminate them.

    • Peajee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Well, proper infrastructure definitely makes car “accidents” much less likely. Also deaths should not be the only statistic here, much more people get disabled by cars than killed

    • BothsidesistFraud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      You are right that you pretty much can’t eliminate edge cases, like addicts running in traffic at night.

      However, Chicago is notoriously lawless for driving and a lot of these deaths were due to running red lights, lane violations, turning through peds at an intersection, etc. All of those can be addressed pretty effectively.