If AI ends up running companies better than people, won’t shareholders demand the switch? A board isn’t paying a CEO $20 million a year for tradition, they’re paying for results. If an AI can do the job cheaper and get better returns, investors will force it.

And since corporations are already treated as “people” under the law, replacing a human CEO with an AI isn’t just swapping a worker for a machine, it’s one “person” handing control to another.

That means CEOs would eventually have to replace themselves, not because they want to, but because the system leaves them no choice. And AI would be considered a “person” under the law.

  • Patches@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    All of you are missing the point.

    CEOs and The Board are the same people. The majority of CEOs are board members at other companies, and vice-versa. It’s a big fucking club and you ain’t in it.

    Why would they do this to themselves?

    Secondly, we already have AI running companies. You think some CEOs and Board Members aren’t already using this shit bird as a god? Because they are