• Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    My first reaction especially given other things I’ve heard about this book was Wtf is wrong with this lady?

    The full quote is not quite as bad as I assumed:

    “I agree with the concerns expressed by parents and players that we have to take into account biological factors such as muscle mass and unfair student athletic advantage when we determine who plays on which teams, especially in contact sports,” Harris reportedly wrote. “With goodwill and common sense, I believe we can come up with ways to do this, without vilifying and demonizing children.”

    Every time somebody brings up concerns over trans athletes I always think about these images of Katherine Switzer running the Boston Marathon:

    I question why we have gender divisions in the first place, bc it’s definitely not that society was ever concerned about fairness. The reason gender divisions were created in the first place, is the same reason we originally had racial based divisions until one day we didn’t.

    That guy wasn’t physically assaulting Switzer and trying to stop her from becoming the first woman to run the Boston Marathon bc he was concerned she may be at an unfair disadvantage. He was trying to stop her bc back when the marathon first started somebody made “No girls allowed!” one of the rules, and this guy was uncomfortable with change. It seems pretty obvious now, that was just a dumb and unnecessary rule to begin with.

    If this is all really about fairness like people claim, then maybe we should consider just nixing gender divisions entirely and moving to something like weight class or skill level divisions for competitive sports.