In Japan and South Korea there is deepening concern over the reliability of long-time American security guarantees – whether the U.S. will come to their aid in the event of a war. This has been turbo-charged by Donald Trump’s tough treatment of traditional U.S. allies, which has some in Tokyo and Seoul calling for a reassessment of their non-nuclear policies.

  • grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Hey Canada…We should be thinking about this, also.

    • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’ve been saying that since 2008 as a teen but man was that an unpopular opinion. We’re a very naive country imo.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I wish but… Do you think they won’t invade us at the whiff of nuclear armament?

      • grte@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        8 days ago

        I don’t trust them not to invade us without that protection, anyways.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          Agreed. I just think that would make it certain.

          If we could get nukes secretly I’d be all up for it.

          • grte@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            If Japan and South Korea go through with this perhaps we could purchase some from them (or elsewhere, UK, France, hell, even China) to cover us while we work on a domestic program.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        8 days ago

        Building nukes is like unionizing; ideally you don’t go public until you already have your nukes/union

        • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 days ago

          Gonna be tough to hide when all our computer systems run on Microsoft, Google, or Amazon platforms.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          I don’t think we could realistically hide it from their agents but yeah, totally. That’ll probably be the way if our gov’t decides to do it.

  • myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    8 days ago

    After the UN ramble yesterday, no one should rely on Trump and the US for anything. Every country should be looking for alternatives to US guarantees.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      I didn’t watch and haven’t seen anything on it. Was it Normal 2025 Trump bad, or something extra special?

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    You know who really needs the bomb? Canada needs the bomb. It has a hostile authoritarian military superpower on its border with 10x the population, hostile trade relations, and a stated intention by national leaders to invade and conquer core Canadian territories. Canada is in the exact situation where a nuclear deterrent is most justifiable. If nukes are ever justifiable, they’re justifiable for small powers facing potential invasion by aggressive larger ones.

    Canada needs the bomb.

    • Corhen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      That’s the difference between Obama’s stance of “we won’t use the bomb if you don’t have it” and trump/Putin’s “we won’t take you seriously if you don’t have the bomb”

      One encourages disarmormebt. The other armorment

    • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Apples & oranges honestly. Best would be no one resorts to that strategy. 2nd best is extreme regimes - especially vindicative and religious ones - don’t have such weapons.

      • rezad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I mean I am sure usa germany and japan are the most peace loving countries in the last century. unlike iran that literally didnt start a war in that last 200 years.

        sorry.

        from my perspective my country needs nukes the most of the “Candidates”

        • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Actually this is a good point. 2 of them actually grew out of their initial ways. Admittedly one regressed.

          But neither Germany nor Japan are fucking theocracies beheading gays or whatever.

          So you gouvernement can suck dicks and hopefully gets replaced by a secural one.

          • rezad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            if palestine shown anything is that the collective west didnt grow out of any of its bad habits.

            whole of west got behind destroying syria so that “assad” should go because he was bad. because assa “bombed hostpitals and you wouldnt do that even to kill Al-Qaeda terrorists”

            now he is replaced with Al-Qaeda commander and he gets welcomed in france and usa. and jewish isis gets to bomb every hospital and university and be the animal that they are because “khamas”.

            if you think western regime goals is “saving gays” or something like that you are retarded.

            if Libya Syria Afghanistan and of course the best of them saudi arabia was not enough to show you what is the most important foreign goals of eu and usa, I can’t help you.

            • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              The hell you bring Palestine into how a theocracy should be prevented to get access to nuclear dissuasion? Stay on the topic please… They are a shit regime that must not have access to more than what they have and even that is too much.

              • rezad@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                I am trying to show you some points.

                all those you call secular governments in west like uk usa france germany and so on, did and continue to do invasions war crimes and atrocity world over.

                so I don’t get your obsession with non-secular countries, and thinking that only non-secular countries are capable of good.

                whatever my government does , doesn’t even get near to level of what Israel did for the last 80 years and especially last two years.

                and all those “secular” countries supported israel completely with actions (words are useless)

                israel is a secular country? if so that is news to their government which read from their religious texts when they do an genocide and war crimes. if you have not head that it is because you are ignorant. and those secular regimes is west are completely fine with them doing it.

                so I don’t think west care about religious genocide if their buddies commit it.

                and my country needs the nukes to survive as history has shown western regimes treaties are not worth the paper that it is written on. if jcpoa didnt show that nothing will. they bombed who they want and kill whoever they want.

                be better informed and don’t be fox news level of ignorant.

                • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Again you are steering away from the discussion ; focus please. 2 wrongs never did a right.

                  Whatever you try to weasel about comparing other countries is absolutely irrelevant when discussing the likelihood of Iran having access to nuclear weapons being a good thing.

                  The rest of the world being filled to the brim with assholes is irrelevant. My county is irrelevant.

                  We are just looking at a shit gouvernement in Iran in a fucking vacuum.

                  And the possibility that THEY get nuclear weapons being is atrocious in itself.

            • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              I what?

              So not only you keep on steering away from the point but you are hilariously wrong on all your assumptions.

              My county of residence and origin is absolutely not making abortions illegal.

              Also I, as a citizen, am not making anything illegal. I’m taking great care to separate country, government and citizen which you should really consider doing as well.

              Governments makes things illegal. An often times a specific branch there of. Generally not citizens themselves with very odd exceptions like parts of Switzerland and such.

              I’m having an opinion which I’m very much entitled to in a fucking democracy. Which might be an alien concept to you I gather.

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    Japan having nukes is gonna be PR nightmare given their imperialistic history lol.

    As for South Korea and ROC/Taiwan, sure thing. UK ot France should sell them some nuclear armed submarines lol.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    Japan actually has the technology and know-how to rapidly spin up a nuclear weapons program because they were already doing it before signing up on their non-nuclear policies with the US.

    The real question is which country is going to be the first to actually jump ship. I’m fairly certain like 95% of the UN is just going to wait out Trump’s term and hope the next president will undo all his insane plans, because no one wants to lose longstanding ties with the US, even as the rug pull of 70+ years of American influence going under gets closer to reality.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Don’t be silly, the US will be happy to sell weapons to South Korea and Japan. Also, they will sell to whoever attacks them!