• TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes, but also why does the government need to be involved?

    I understand wanting clarity in good naming and standards, but I’ll never confuse a tofu burger or reconstituted mycelium protein nuggets with actual meat.

    There is no real risk to the consumer in having language like tofu burger and veggie steak

    • FelixCress@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      why does the government need to be involved?

      Because consumers should not be misled by deceiving manufacturers.

      • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you see “plant burger” and you are misled to think that it must be made of beef, that says a lot more about you than the manufacturer.

      • TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Stupid reason. Burger used to mean pork and beef. There were laws for this. Now we have chicken burgers?? Yeah nobody cares.

        • FelixCress@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Stupid reason

          Would it be OK to sell some cheap dog meat burgers as “vegan”? I meant taste would be probably the same but still misleading, don’t you think?

      • TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah I know my comment was 3 whole paragraphs and you can’t read gud, but I actually managed to address that