

Read. Again. Slowly. 🤦
Read. Again. Slowly. 🤦
Of course. Israel can take action of stopping the genocide of Palestinians. They just don’t want to.
You should just stop embarrassing yourself.
Are you a teenager? 🙄
So which side would we chose ?
Yeah, perfect mod 🙄
Fucking racists. Should be sent for compulsory re-education courses.
Removed by mod
Are you a mod here by any chance? Don’t like criticism?
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Read again. You cannot be sacked for having a relationship and companies are not allowed to forbid that. Admit you were wrong and move on.
Link to an actual review rather than YouTube? We can read, you know.
It is perfectly normal to not have your personal life controlled by a company, yes.
Blows USians mind, eh?
Thank you, try to explain it to morons who downvoted my comment.
You can be sleeping with your employees dude that’s a clear power imbalance dynamic and you would be fired here too for having a relationship with a subordinate.
Educate yourself.
https://www.employmentlawreview.co.uk/personal-relationships-at-work-what-does-uk-law-say/
You can be forced to disclose relationships and sacked if you fail to do so. You cannot be sacked for having a relationship.
Completely banning personal relationships at work would likely breach an employee’s right to a private life. However, that doesn’t mean employers can’t put measures in place to mitigate risks to the business caused by such relationships. Policies employers may want to consider implementing include:
Ensuring that employees disclose any workplace relationships they have so that appropriate steps can be taken to minimise risks
Restricting employees who deal with recruitment from the process if it involves someone they have a personal relationship with
Potentially changing an employee’s manager if they’re in a relationship with their current one, providing this doesn’t discriminate against them
Stock goes down,
Why?
they lay people off to make it go up
This. Is. Not. How. It. Works.
And they will be without a CEO for a while
Substantial costs savings.
The fill in person probably will be at a disadvantage in deal negotiations because the topic of conversation will be the affair,
This is one of the wildest assumptions I have seen for a while.
That will also hurt the companies future prospects and stock price.
How?
if you’ve been proven to be immoral and a liar no one wants to work with you or buy your product
*Donald Trump enters the chat
Also, most companies have a written policy about fraternizing with subordinates. It usually states termination as a consequence of breaking the policy.
This is completely fucking moronic. Employees are not a company property. Good there is the article 8 (right to private life) of Humans Rights Act in the UK, stopping madness like this.
Stop with these fucking YouTube links. People can read, you know.
Disclosure - yes. That can be requested and an employee may be sacked if he fails to disclose such information. Unlike USA however, companies are unable to tell an employee to NOT have a relationship with someone at work. It can make a decision to move employees in relationship to other teams if for example there is a risk involved.