Stating she wasn’t allowed to leave is not a reason, why she wasn’t allowed to leave would be the reason.
But trying to leave a house is not basis at all for restraining a person, even if you are told not to.
Sounds like a power-trip to me.
If it’s a school for troubled kids, it could very well be to protect the student during the hours they’re supposed to be there, and to protect people outside from them. Letting a raging and troubled person out into the world does not seem healthy or safe. Seems logical to me. They were doing their jobs: protecting the students and other people from the students.
My guess is the grounds around a “residential therapeutic school” are owned by the school.
That would generally be pretty standard for that kind of place.
Stating she wasn’t allowed to leave is not a reason, why she wasn’t allowed to leave would be the reason.
But trying to leave a house is not basis at all for restraining a person, even if you are told not to.
Sounds like a power-trip to me.
If it’s a school for troubled kids, it could very well be to protect the student during the hours they’re supposed to be there, and to protect people outside from them. Letting a raging and troubled person out into the world does not seem healthy or safe. Seems logical to me. They were doing their jobs: protecting the students and other people from the students.
My guess is the grounds around a “residential therapeutic school” are owned by the school.
That would generally be pretty standard for that kind of place.