• MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    8 天前

    Blue states should stop paying taxes. See how well funded his stupid military would be with fucking North Dakota trying to pay for it

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 天前

      This idea keeps coming up and while it sounds great it has the slight problem that states don’t pay taxes, people do. Basically your suggestion is then that people living in blue states should stop paying their taxes. Now, the majority of those taxes are collected for them by the companies they work for. You can reduce (maybe eliminate I’m not actually sure if you can opt into 0% withholding) how much is collected by your employer by filing out a new W-4 form, if they let you. But even setting that aside there’s the problem that none of that will matter in the slightest when the IRS comes for you with an arrest warrant for unpaid taxes. Or they might just start garnishing your wages, I’m honestly not 100% sure how that would play out. I just know that number 1 rule is you don’t fuck with the IRS.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 天前

        There likely wouldn’t be enough IRS agents to audit that many people at once. There aren’t enough to go after tax cheats when people abide by the system en masse, so if there were a concerted effort to stop paying, they would probably have trouble with enforcement.

        Now, I’m 100% certain that the Trump admin would push the IRS to “make examples” of a few unlucky people, and I’m not expecting a large enough pool of people participating in the new viral meme “just don’t pay your taxes, they can’t arrest us all” for it to matter.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 天前

        I looked it up the last time this was discussed, the IRS can override and put back the withholding you requested taken off.

      • witten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 天前

        The states do pay taxes to the federal government. States are some of the largest employers, and they pay federal payroll taxes. Those could be withheld.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 天前

          No court would uphold that.

          Further, virtually all these state accounting and payroll systems are privatized. States don’t pay federal payroll taxes. Officials simply administer contracts to private firms that handle payroll and deductions. And you’re not going to like who the managers of these mega-accounting and payroll management companies supported in 2024.

          What you’re asking these officials to do is issue an obviously illegal order to a subordinate who will simply ignore them and report them to the IRS for prosecution.

          • witten@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 天前

            No court would uphold the federal government, and specifically the executive branch, withholding congressionally appropriated funds destined to states. And yet here we are.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 天前

        Yes, it would be very logistically challenging. However if it were to succeed it cannot be piecemeal, it must be organized from the top down, with state-funded resources to help bail out those who the IRS retaliates against.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 天前

          state-funded resources to help bail out those who the IRS retaliates against.

          That’s been the hang up for a while. How much are state officials willing to do in defiance of the federal government?

          To date, not much

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 天前

    Hey, remember that “Jade Helm” thing that the Republicans went completely apeshit over back when Obama was president?

    Hm.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    8 天前

    Also in the news:

    https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5579661-trump-approval-rating-drop-economist-yougov/

    Trump’s approval hits new low for second term: Poll

    President Trump’s overall job approval reached a new second-term low in the latest Economist/YouGov survey.

    The poll, conducted this past weekend, shows Trump 19 points underwater, with 39 percent of Americans approving of his handling of the presidency and 58 percent disapproving.

    YouGov pollsters noted the president’s negative-19 net approval is also lower than all but one poll during his first term.

    Among 18- to 29-year-olds in the latest survey, Trump was nearly 55 points underwater — with only 20 percent approving of the way Trump handles his job and 75 percent disapproving.

    That represents a stark reversal from February, when Trump enjoyed a positive net approval among young adults of more than 8 points — with 50 percent approving and 42 percent disapproving.

    He’s definitely speed-running the unpopularity numbers.

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 天前

    Until you guys stop him then this isn’t a claim. It’s a threat, it’s a promise, and it’s your future.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 天前

    “Our military exists to defend the nation and protect our freedoms, not to be weaponized against American cities,” said critics.

    See? That right there, that is your problem. That should not be “critics” but “everybody”

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 天前

    Just for some context: the prohibition of using the Military in the States dates back to reconstruction. Slaveholding States didn’t like the Yankee Army protecting Civil rights.

    I’m not defending Trump, but the idea that using troops as law enforcement is “Un-American” or tyrannical is Confederate propaganda.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 天前

      There’s another way to look at this. Fascism has often been defined as “Imperialism Returning to the Core”. A great deal of the ICE buildup and the arming of Sheriff’s Deputy Gangs with military surplus is coming from the surplus men who came out of our Iraq and Afghanistan occupations.

      Even before you get into using the explicit military (rather than the paramilitary) on US soil, you’d do well to recognize that we’re employing the same tactics against LA and Chicago that we had once employed in Baghdad and Kandahar. The escalation of troops into cities matches Bush/McCain era “Surge” rhetoric, with many of the same rationales and objectives.

      the idea that using troops as law enforcement is “Un-American” or tyrannical is Confederate propaganda

      Might be worth remembering that the original Confederate Army was composed of rebel officers from the Mexican-American War. You can draw a straight line from the annexation of Texas and California, through the failed filibuster of Cuba, and on to the First Battle of Bull Run. Future Confederate soldiers cut their teeth in Bleeding Kansas and suppressed the slave revolt at Harper’s Ferry.

      Using troops as law enforcement was their whole game, until the got punted out of Gettysburg and torched straight through Atlanta on to Savannah.

      And the turn in rhetoric somehow didn’t extend to the Battle of Blair Mountain or the suppression of Civil Rights Marches in Selma, much less the gunning down of anti-war protesters at Kent State.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 天前

      The world has learned a lot about the separation of police and military in the past 100 years or so. If you don’t prefer the term “Anti-American” how about “Anti-human rights”?

    • drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 天前

      Troops are not trained law enforcement personnel. They are trained to threaten and kill.

      Also, civil rights weren’t solidified into law until about a century later.

      I do agree that this kind of threat is very American, though.