slazer2au@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoNew EU directive drop.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up1461arrow-down18
arrow-up1453arrow-down1imageNew EU directive drop.lemmy.worldslazer2au@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square61fedilink
minus-squareashenone@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up83arrow-down1·4 months agoMy boy nano getting a drive by. He always there for me when I need to quickly edit a conf file
minus-squareunknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up25·4 months agoDelete nano already. Let’s make micro the standard!!
minus-squaretal@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·4 months agoed is, in fact, in the POSIX standard. https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/ Shell & Utilities -> Utilities -> ed In fact, it looks like ex and sed, both child editors of ed, are baked into the standard. No pico-family editors.
minus-squarewizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·4 months agoNice, an analognowhere I missed!
minus-squareashenone@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up11·4 months agoWhy should micro be the standard over nano?
minus-squareunknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down1·edit-24 months agoBecause nano has unacceptable key combos, and no support for mouse. micro has sensible key combos, good syntax highlighting and supports mouse perfectly fine.
My boy nano getting a drive by. He always there for me when I need to quickly edit a conf file
Delete
nanoalready.Let’s make
microthe standard!!Nah,
ededis, in fact, in the POSIX standard.https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/
Shell & Utilities -> Utilities -> ed
In fact, it looks like
exandsed, both child editors ofed, are baked into the standard. Nopico-family editors.Nice, an analognowhere I missed!
Y e s
Why should micro be the standard over nano?
Because
nanohas unacceptable key combos, and no support for mouse.microhas sensible key combos, good syntax highlighting and supports mouse perfectly fine.