• SippyCup@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      25 days ago

      Charles Schumer makes policy decisions based on an imaginary Republican family.

      Democrats have been basically Republicans since the Clinton administration.

    • DNS@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      Democrats are controlled opposition, which the belief is solidified by the recent senate vote. I’ll still vote blue, but if the politician option of it being a coward/establishment then I might as well vote for a rat. Absolute disgusted our elected leaders have no spine as Republicans continue on their quest to achieve fascism and white supremacy.

      Fuck those 6 and fuck Schumer.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        25 days ago

        I’ll still vote blue, but if the politician option of it being a coward/establishment then I might as well vote for a rat.

        why not vote for 3rd party instead of wasting your vote like this?

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          25 days ago

          The republicans have a strong enough, brainwashed base that will vote for them come hell or high water. Around 35% of people who will vote are seriously engaged on their side and will do whatever they need to vote for them. That’s a pretty strong hurdle to overcome

          The democrats also have a contingent of Better Blue than Red and will vote for them no matter what.

          The largest party next in line would be the Green party, and honestly, they’re barely trying. I mean the head of the party has investments in Fossil Fuel companies supporting fracking. AOC rightfully critisized them for a lack of organiztional development. It’s just this mess of funding going in and our for visibility and the dilution of the “not republican” vote.

          So voting for a third party, at best, lets the republicans continue their destruction of the country and sends a message to the democrats that we’re tired of their crap, which has happened twice now with zero changes.

          If you want us to vote for 3rd party, you need to deliver us a 3rd party with enough leadership to campaign and win it.

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            25 days ago

            So voting for a third party, at best, lets the republicans continue their destruction of the country and sends a message to the democrats that we’re tired of their crap, which has happened twice now with zero changes

            the democrats and republicans are 2 extremes of this same pro-late stage capitalist status quo system so expecting anything to change by vacillating between them is an unrealistic non-starter.

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              25 days ago

              s are 2 extremes of this same pro-late stage capitalist status quo system so expecting anything to change by vacillating between them is an unrealistic non-starter.

              I don’t disagree, but voting for a 3rd in a tw- party race will also be a useless non-starter.

              • eldavi@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                25 days ago

                history has given us several examples of this happening; with mexico being the most recent one and in our lifetimes.

                those examples prove over and over again that it’s the self-reinforcing propaganda that keeps us back, not two-party; spoiler-vote; fptp; electoral-college; etc. nonsense.

          • orc_princess@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            25 days ago

            For nationwide elections I agree there isn’t much of a choice, but I’d argue voting third party outside of swing states is still good to express dissatisfaction, and third parties and independents can still win in local elections.

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              25 days ago

              but I’d argue voting third party outside of swing states

              absolutely, and i’m a fan of this, let’s get congress full of third, as long as it’s not libretarian third :)

        • Lennny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          When did America decide to remove first past the post? Oh they didn’t …so how is 3rd party not a wasted vote?

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            25 days ago

            not only is it possible, but it has happened and is currently happening in our lifetimes: either read a non-western history book to see several historical examples of political duopolies being overturned by 3rd parties (until the americans reversed it) or look for modern sources showing a 3rd party named morena overthrow its american backed duopoloy in mexico less than 10 years ago.

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      You mean the two Dems and the independent that acted as scabs and went against the rest of the democratic party?

      US Senate advances bill to end federal shutdown

      Sunday’s deal was brokered by Democratic Senators Maggie Hassan and Jeanne Shaheen, both from New Hampshire, and Senator Angus King, an independent from Maine, said a person familiar with the talks. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, the chamber’s top Democrat, voted against the measure. Many Democrats on the Hill watched the deal unfold with displeasure.

        • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          I agree this should be the career ending vote for 8 scabs, but I also think refusing to replace them with better candidates if they also run as dems, won’t do anything other than guarantee the re-election of 8 scabs.

          • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            25 days ago

            It doesnt matter if they’re democrat or independent - what matters is that they aren’t a class traitor.

            Do whatever you want but I sure as fuck wouldnt vote for a democrat who is going to sell me out as soon as acting in my interest is politically inconvenient.