In her new book, Kamala Harris insists she only lost the election because she didn’t have enough time. But she accidentally demonstrates the real reason: she’s a terrible politician.
Oh, so you don’t like my summary of the article you didn’t read
I actually read quite a bit of the article before responding.
For instance her idea that having a gay running mate might be a problem, was in my opinion naive.
It’s like she thinks democratic voters will only vote for the status quo, when they are screaming for change.
But that so typical for many people, they are so obsessed with appearances, that they end up always seeming superficial and shallow and without substance.
Stupid when there was no way she could beat Trump on that aspect.
I actually read quite a bit of the article before responding.
For instance her idea that having a gay running mate might be a problem, was in my opinion naive.
It’s like she thinks democratic voters will only vote for the status quo, when they are screaming for change.
But that so typical for many people, they are so obsessed with appearances, that they end up always seeming superficial and shallow and without substance.
Stupid when there was no way she could beat Trump on that aspect.