Removed by mod

This is bad enough, but we also know they’re not touching actual criminals (they fight back). So they’re very explicitly going after the lowest-hanging fruit possible.

Did people think they were rounding up criminals?

That’s gotta be lower than the national average.

I want to know what fraction of a percent, if any, had felonies. Most of the time when they toughted someone was a criminal it ended up being a traffic ticket.

The detained are the most non combative people. An old white person would throw a fit and slap box the shit out of ice officers.

I want to believe this but there is absolutely no evidence, provided by this article, to back this up.

Why wouldn’t you link the filing you are supposedly quoting?

*Edit:

On my phone. There is a link to a a Chicago Tribune article in the section past where they initially referenced the data.

I had clicked a couple of links where OP’s article referenced the DoJ data and they were just references to other articles in its own publication.

I guess I gave up too early.

On that note though, how about OP just post the original article instead of this derivative trash article?

It has been so easy for people to generate bullshit news articles for manufactured news aggregates that reference circulary, for the purpose of obscuring the truth,.or creating wedge issues.

So now, if I don’t recognize the publisher, and it is setup like this one, I immediately smell bullshit.