I want to believe this but there is absolutely no evidence, provided by this article, to back this up.
Why wouldn’t you link the filing you are supposedly quoting?
*Edit:
On my phone. There is a link to a a Chicago Tribune article in the section past where they initially referenced the data.
I had clicked a couple of links where OP’s article referenced the DoJ data and they were just references to other articles in its own publication.
I guess I gave up too early.
On that note though, how about OP just post the original article instead of this derivative trash article?
It has been so easy for people to generate bullshit news articles for manufactured news aggregates that reference circulary, for the purpose of obscuring the truth,.or creating wedge issues.
So now, if I don’t recognize the publisher, and it is setup like this one, I immediately smell bullshit.
I want to believe this but there is absolutely no evidence, provided by this article, to back this up.
Why wouldn’t you link the filing you are supposedly quoting?
*Edit:
On my phone. There is a link to a a Chicago Tribune article in the section past where they initially referenced the data.
I had clicked a couple of links where OP’s article referenced the DoJ data and they were just references to other articles in its own publication.
I guess I gave up too early.
On that note though, how about OP just post the original article instead of this derivative trash article?
It has been so easy for people to generate bullshit news articles for manufactured news aggregates that reference circulary, for the purpose of obscuring the truth,.or creating wedge issues.
So now, if I don’t recognize the publisher, and it is setup like this one, I immediately smell bullshit.
deleted by creator