I don’t quite understand the criticism. It’s not gonna be top of the line, but it’s more than enough to replace my dying laptop from 2015 that I pretty much only ever use like a desktop anyway. And I can save myself the time and effort of picking parts, building, and dealing with shit not working as expected.

  • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It makes no sense to me not allowing anticheat on unmotivated steamOS…

    I mean, valve could even build something in, like secure mode, where you have a secure little linux root system for each anticheat game together with a online hash to check against this hole separated file system

    Like when you start the game, steamOS boots in this separate root system

    • Wolfram@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Unmotivated? Its a literal checkbox in the anticheats that games package to enable running in Proton. This is not Valve’s responsibility, but idiot or lazy game companies/devs.

      Secure boot is what I think you’re thinking of because of Battlefield 6. But as I understand from just skimming it, its handled a bit differently in Linux than Windows, so unsure of how that could be handled or adapted for native Windows games.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Anti-cheat, even kernel level anti-cheat has worked on Linux for a very long time. Some of the most popular products used by AAA have been available for years. They just intentionally refuse to make their products work on Linux.

      Remember Genshin Impact, for example. It literally has an internal flag that instantly closes the game if it detects it is running on Linux. There’s no technical limitation for any of those big multiplayer titles from working, they just don’t want them to.