With the release of the Epstein files looming, experts warn that the expected documents will only be the tip of the iceberg in what could turn into a decades-long fight over transparency.

The passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act started a 30-day countdown to the release of records related to child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his associates by the Justice Department.

The text of the law, however, gives the Justice Department and the attorney general, Pam Bondi, significant discretion in deciding what exactly to release and what to withhold from the public.

The law allows the attorney general to withhold the release of files that “depict or contain” child sexual abuse material or contain images of death, physical abuse or injury, for example.

However, the law also gives the attorney general the power to withhold information that they believe would “jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution.” It also allows the department to withhold classified information, which is to be defined by a presidential executive order.

National security, however, provides the broadest justification for withholding information, with the law giving the attorney general the power to judge whether certain information poses a threat to national security. Given Epstein’s deep ties to both foreign governments and intelligence agencies, the umbrella of national security could potentially cover huge swaths of what the government knows about Epstein.

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I haven’t understood the fight for the “release of the Epstein files” since the start.

    What’s to prevent them releasing fake documents?

    As if this administration would ever release information detrimental to Trump or any other republican in favor.

    The coming release will include nothing of substance about republicans.

    • Dragomus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Most likely there are a few other “originals” out there that keep all involved parties in check.
      Epstein had files stashed on the island but also his Manhattan office (which got stolen after the fbi opened the safe but did not remove them), ghislaine is said to have files, and probably one copy is in the hands of putin, epstein was in Moscow…
      So if the trump admin releases an overtly fake version that exonerates everyone “on his side” another party can release opposing documents.

      This already somewhat happened last month, where the administration released redacted files and highly selected documents, where suddenly various publicly unknown epstein emails surfaced that pointed back to trump.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Yes, but will any of Trump’s supporters really care what may be in the original documents if a doctored set released by the administration provides cover?

        • IronBird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          trump’s supporters dont matter in the grand scheme of things, not really. it’s not the cult members you need to convince, it’s the non-cult. the grifters and opportunists will flip on whoever the instant it looks like they might finally face personal accountability for their actions, a handful of true-believers like MTG will draw the line at (openly) helping/enabling pedophiles (if not for their own limited moral compass then for their own personal safety)…plenty of people in this country who’d have no issue executing pedos and their enablers if it looks like they might get off scot-free