• merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    And you sound like someone who wants to be able to run red lights without consequences.

    • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      No, I just want traffic lights enforced without being in a surveilance state, but the better solution is just to make more streets illegal to have cars instead of adding lights, and add bus routes instead

      But people will be lazy and say eh, surveilance state is good enough for me since Im not affected! More buses. Fewer cars. Fewer lights necessary and fewer surveliance cameras necessary.

      • Thadrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        without being in a surveilance state

        Those cameras only activate when people run a red light, right? And if they don’t, that’s the problem that should be fixed, not taking down the whole thing instead. People following the rules and not endanger others is kinda a good thing.