• alias_qr_rainmaker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      2 hours ago

      seriously! i used to use chatgpt all the damn time but then i got into claude and gemini. they are WAY better for code. now i got cursor pro and i use that for all my shit because it’s got the AI agents, the browser, the code editor, and the terminal

    • cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It works wonderfully well as a search engine, when I have to find obscure specialized info. Can always criss check once I have a idea.

      • IngeniousRocks (They/She) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        40 minutes ago

        Its not a search engine, its a data digester. Dont use it as a search engine. Despite what alphabet, micro-shit, and DDG think, AI chatbots do not now, nor will they ever make good search engines.

        This is a prime example of why access to these tools should be restricted to computer scientists and research labs. The average person doesn’t know how to use them effectively (resulting in enormous power wasted by ‘prompt engineering’), and the standard available models aren’t good at digesting non-linguistic data.

        I’m not gonna downvote you, or be like all “AI is the devil and its gonna kill us all” but people need to use it correctly or we ARE going to kill ourselves with its waste heat.

        Edit: ficksed an werd

      • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Because companies destroyed actual search engines in the race for billions of dollars.

        Kagi, searx are fricken awesome and much like the web in mid 2000s before corporations destroyed it.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Regular search engines did that 20 years ago, without blowing out the power grid.

        • Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 minutes ago

          No they didn’t and they still don’t really do that.

          There are too many things (nowadays?) where you have to literally write a question on reddit, stack overflow or Lemmy or the likes and explain your situation in minute detail, because what you find online through search engines is only the standard case which just so happens to not work for you for some odd reason.

          Believe me, when I say that, because I always try search engines first, second and third, before even thinking of using some bs-spitting AI, but it really helped me with two very special problems in the last month.

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            41 minutes ago

            And LLM’s aren’t gamed? Like Grok constantly being tweaked to not say anything inconvenient about Musk? Or ChatGPT citing absurd Reddit posts deliberately made by users to make AI responses wrong?

            AI is built from the ground up to do what they want, and they’re no better than those crappy info-scraper sites like wearethewindoezproz dot com that scrape basic info off every other site and offer it as a solution to your problem with [SOLVED] in the result title. “Did you turn it off and on again?”

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 hour ago

          And now we have something better. I’m all for a better grid running on renewables though, which is the actual problem.