• Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    That kills the less active ones and achieves the opposite of what Lemmy wants to do.

    • nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It would force you to write a more descriptive name. Maybe we want to hide by community title and not the handle though.

      Say you want to have a community for memes. It is terrible UX if you just see seven different “memes@domainname.ending” in the result. So with an opinionated search, you instead name your community Sopuli Memes, Solarpunk Memes, Programming Memes etc., or just Funny Memes Archive, and they would not be hidden.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      A lot of the “less active ones” are completely dead. Many mid-tier topics (not niche, but not “meme shitpost”) have a sea of dead communities and 1-2 active ones and it’s difficult to find them without actually clicking through the full list of results.

      • Skavau@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Tbh, and I plan to do this for piefed.social soon (and rimu has given me the go-ahead) - abandoned discarded communities with literally zero posts need to be purged by instances. It’s just clutter.

        If a community was active and then isn’t, that’s fine, but a lot of communities are made and then never used.