• meejle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    181
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    4 days ago

    Every product we build must give people agency in how it works. Privacy, data use, and AI must be clear and understandable. Controls must be simple. AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off. People should know why a feature works the way it does and what value they get from it.

    Come on, this isn’t Reddit, at least skim the article before you start with the performative outrage.

      • korendian@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        It is opt in, this article is click bait.

        Directly from the horses mouth:

        "In Firefox, you’ll never be locked into one ecosystem or have AI forced into your browsing experience. You decide when, how or whether to use it at all. You’ve already seen this approach in action through some of our latest features like the AI chatbot in the sidebar for desktop or Shake to Summarize on iOS.

        Now, we’re excited to invite you to help shape the work on our next innovation: an AI Window. It’s a new, intelligent and user-controlled space we’re building in Firefox that lets you chat with an AI assistant and get help while you browse, all on your terms. Completely opt-in, you have full control, and if you try it and find it’s not for you, you can choose to switch it off."

        https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/ai-window/

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s not needed. Nobody is looking for AI powered shit and they will feel it in their numbers. Why invest the pennies Mozilla can invest in a technology that big monsters are developing with billions and billions of dollars and natural resources? It’s not even reasonable, like a Pocket 2.0.

    • onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The problem is the “AI” presence in itself. It shouldn’t be in Firefox at all, or frankly in any other software.

      Also, corporations and their CEOs lie every single day, you know.

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Nobody’s saying it’s mandatory. People don’t want their web browsers to be full of bloated AI slop. Why should there be the AI components of Firefox on my hard drive if I’m never going to use them? Why should my web browser be full of low quality features I’ll never use? It’s enshittification. Not to mention the very quote you’re pasting specifies that it’s opt-out, not opt-in.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Unfortunate Newsflash:

      It’s smaller reddit.

      The lowest common denominator consumes all. And that denominator includes not being able to read articles or apply critical thought.

    • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      But how could the trolls enrage well meaning people into moving to a less privacy respecting browser if the post wasn’t designed for performative outrage?

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Few read the articles around here, like any social media. I could come with a headline that Bill Gates proposed using trans people’s brains for AI processing, Matrix style, and harvesting the water of the dead ones, a la Dune. Lemmy would eat it up.