brianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agoNo AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blogwww.waterfox.comexternal-linkmessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1531arrow-down113cross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1518arrow-down1external-linkNo AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blogwww.waterfox.combrianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square82fedilinkcross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.ml
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·7 days agoOkay, so how do you go about the process of fact checking every news article you read?
minus-squareMac@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·edit-27 days agoYou’re never going to believe this: i can take an article at face value because it’s not being routed through a slop generator when i read it. Whether or not a source can be believed to be true is not within the scope of this thread.
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·7 days agoRight, you take the article at face value. So exactly as I originally said: you sure are relying on just believing whatever you read without any checking whatsoever.
minus-squareMac@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 days agoThat’s the opposite of what I said. I’m afraid you’ve given your ability to infer language to AI and therefore there is nothing more to say here. Have a nice day.
Okay, so how do you go about the process of fact checking every news article you read?
You’re never going to believe this: i can take an article at face value because it’s not being routed through a slop generator when i read it.
Whether or not a source can be believed to be true is not within the scope of this thread.
Right, you take the article at face value. So exactly as I originally said:
That’s the opposite of what I said.
I’m afraid you’ve given your ability to infer language to AI and therefore there is nothing more to say here. Have a nice day.