• DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    2 months ago

    Gotta give him some respect for admitting he was wrong, and doing so several times. Everyone is wrong from time to time, but barely anyone can openly admit it.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          But do you put work into the fake?

          I like to invent P-values and fabricate not only participants, but their consent waivers. I sprinkle around terms like Tasseled Cap, Eigenvector, ANOVA, MLR, Covariance Matrices, etc.

          Some people make up stuff because they’re lazy. When my lies are complete, it would have been just as easy to do the actual work because I’m in it for the love of the game.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      And also add to that that this is more like escaping from a cult than it is merely admitting you were silly and wrong.

    • czl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a really good documentary because a lot of them actually want to be scientific about it.

      But instead of following the scientific process of test->observe->draw a conclusion, they start with the conclusion and look for a way to prove it. And when the prof isn’t there, they simply say the test was flawed, and move on to the next test that will prove it.

      It’s sad in a way. I don’t think, most of them anyway, are con man. They’re just misguided.

      • ttyybb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        I will say, starting with a conclusion/theory is fine, but the next step is to do everything you can to disprove it. The more you and other fail, the stronger it becomes

  • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can tell their intelligence rises over the course of the series because they go from portrait to landscape videos.

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What about the other, the subtle cons, like we don’t have to take immediate action against global warming? (Not mentioning the more controversial ones.)

  • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Imagine what the world would be like if the con artists pulling this stuff were pushing people to build libraries and educate kids.

    • transMexicanCRTcowfart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      In general, we’re not taught early enough, if at all, to question both what we ‘perceive’ and the mental blabbering that makes up stories about it.