• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think peak was XP.

    Vista was shit. 7 was alright, but not better than XP. 8 was terrible. 10 was worse than 7, but still meh. 11 is dog shit.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        XP was the first consumer OS with the NT kernel which was far far more reliable than win32 in the previous ones. I remember people bragging that they could leave their computer running and it wouldn’t crash -and that seemed crazy. I used windows 2000 for many years as a stripped down XP, but not many people got it. I think the interface peaked around 95, but the kernel was terribly unreliable.

        • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          My main focus (apart from zero security and horrible multi user) was all the anti consumer additions they put into it.

          XP was so bad, that I left it for linux shortly after it came out.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        98* was pure garbage. You could literally bypass the login screen on 98 because it had no real user account and tokens, just profiles for convenience. Driver support was awful, there was no memory protection so drivers constantly caused bsod. XP was the first time the consumer desktop got the NT foundation, meaning real user/session security, far better stability under load, and way fewer “one program crashed, so the OS is toast” moments.

        XP had its problems too, it’s still Windows afterall and Windows was always garbage. But 98 was awful.

        • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yes 98 was terrible. 2000 wasn’t so bad.

          But XP started the data harvesting, the lying to users, the forced applications, and so much more.

          On top of even worse security than 2000 (also nt) had.

          I could go on for days how bad it was.