Its happening because people’s brains are ‘adapting’ to the short form, brainrot mode of modern social media.
This is what I feared way back when Twitter first gained popularity. I couldn’t get into it, because the short character limit made it impossible to explain pretty much anything.
Anyway, I’m with you on this. If you’ve got something important or novel to share, it’s probably going to take some explanation to convey it. Short-form social media leads to shallow conversations. I like depth, I like exploring others’ perspectives, and it takes more than 160 characters (or whatever the limits are now) to really reach some subjects.
I say this as someone with unmedicated ADHD - modern people’s attention spans are depressing. I still love watching documentaries that are 2+ hours long, even when YouTube tries to push for 30-second clips of garbage. Thank goodness for Lemmy and Mastodon, offering us the chance to really dive deep into conversations that most social media want to clip short.
Well, beyond creating an account when Elon basically accidentally bought it, to scream at him, untill in all likelihood, he personally banned me.
Twitter took off because celebrities and primarily Democrat politicians joined an used it as essentially a microblogging/messaging system.
Our first social steps into modern parasociality.
They were of course eventually more or less thoroughly routed and out-influenced by hordes of right wing 4 chan trolls, who were much, much more adept at understanding how information flow actually works on the internet.
… anyway, yeah, i more or less see lemmy and piefed and mastadon as the last sort of… strung together set of rafts, floating amidst a sea of corporate sponsored, literal insanity, at this point.
This is what I feared way back when Twitter first gained popularity. I couldn’t get into it, because the short character limit made it impossible to explain pretty much anything.
Anyway, I’m with you on this. If you’ve got something important or novel to share, it’s probably going to take some explanation to convey it. Short-form social media leads to shallow conversations. I like depth, I like exploring others’ perspectives, and it takes more than 160 characters (or whatever the limits are now) to really reach some subjects.
I say this as someone with unmedicated ADHD - modern people’s attention spans are depressing. I still love watching documentaries that are 2+ hours long, even when YouTube tries to push for 30-second clips of garbage. Thank goodness for Lemmy and Mastodon, offering us the chance to really dive deep into conversations that most social media want to clip short.
Yep.
Its why I never used Twitter.
Well, beyond creating an account when Elon basically accidentally bought it, to scream at him, untill in all likelihood, he personally banned me.
Twitter took off because celebrities and primarily Democrat politicians joined an used it as essentially a microblogging/messaging system.
Our first social steps into modern parasociality.
They were of course eventually more or less thoroughly routed and out-influenced by hordes of right wing 4 chan trolls, who were much, much more adept at understanding how information flow actually works on the internet.
… anyway, yeah, i more or less see lemmy and piefed and mastadon as the last sort of… strung together set of rafts, floating amidst a sea of corporate sponsored, literal insanity, at this point.