In 1987, wildlife veterinarian Mark Pokras was in his office at Tufts University in Massachusetts when a colleague from New Hampshire called. “I’ve got a dead loon here,” she said. “If I bring it down to you, can you tell me how it died?”

Understanding what’s killing wild animals is often the first step to saving them, and over the course of his career, Pokras has necropsied everything from whales to hummingbirds. Yet this was his first loon—in part because common loons (Gavia immer) had only recently begun repopulating New England after being nearly extirpated by 300 years of hunting, pollution, and habitat loss. European settlers so disliked these “ill-shap’d” birds that nature writer Henry David Thoreau described his neighbors on Walden Pond in Massachusetts shooting them just for fun. By the early 1900s, common loons—which winter on the coast and spend summers nesting along inland lakes—had disappeared from their breeding grounds in Massachusetts and much of New Hampshire, and been reduced to a fraction of their former abundance elsewhere in New England. Places with names like Loon Pond didn’t see nesting loons for more than a century.

Cutting into the bird, Pokras discovered that it had suffered from lead toxicosis, more commonly known as lead poisoning. Loons eat pebbles to help digest food in their gizzard, and this one may have mistaken a lead sinker left behind by a fisherman for a pebble, or perhaps eaten a fish with a lead sinker in its body. In Pokras’s X-ray, the sinker showed up as an unnaturally round ball amid a mess of partially digested fish and shellfish. After the bird ate it, the lead would have leached toxicants into the bloodstream, causing impaired vision, gastrointestinal distress, neurologic issues, and ultimately death.

In an era when many species are declining because of multipronged, seemingly intractable problems, the solution to protecting loons is relatively straightforward. Anglers simply need to swap their old lead jigs and sinkers for tackle made from tungsten, steel, tin, or bismuth. Given loons’ immense popularity, you might think that would be an easy sell. But although conservationists have tried educating the public for decades—and although Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Massachusetts have laws regulating the use and sale of lead fishing tackle—lead is still responsible for around 25 to 30 percent of loon deaths in most states and provinces, and until recently, nearly 40 percent in New Hampshire. Why?

The answer, at least in the United States, is entangled with gun rights.

  • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    4 days ago

    "But how did the fight over lead bullets thwart efforts to regulate lead fishing tackle? Many hunting and fishing organizations have ties to the NRA, and they maintain that any effort to regulate tackle will open the door to regulating ammunition, and that any effort to regulate ammunition is an assault on Americans’ gun rights.

    “One of the unusual things about lead is there are very few other toxic materials that have a huge public lobby in favor of them,” Pokras says. “You don’t see a lot of members of the public out there campaigning [for] more DDT or neonicotinoid pesticides. But with lead there’s a huge, wealthy, politically influential contingent supporting it.”

    I fucking hate it here. I love loons.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    I grew up somewhere hunting was an important part of the local culture, and I learned to hunt at a young age. We often chose copper bullets rather than lead for performance reasons. A ban on lead bullets would not make hunting meaningfully harder. Copper costs more, but if ammunition cost has a significant impact on someone’s ability to hunt, they’re doing it wrong.

    A ban on lead practice ammunition would have a significant impact, but the article does not discuss that.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        My dad has cast his own lead bullets. The equipment to do it is inexpensive and commercially available, and it’s easy to come by scrap lead. It’s common for hobbyists to add tin and antimony to adjust the hardness.

        Copper has a much higher melting point than lead, so it would be more difficult and dangerous to attempt to cast it with hobbyist-grade equipment. I’m not sure if casting copper would produce good bullets; a quick web search suggests copper bullets are made by machining or cold swaging. It would certainly be possible to make bullets from round ropper rods by machining them with a hobbyist-grade lathe, but it would be time-consuming.

  • FirstCircle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s bizarre to me that loons were hated and killed for fun. Just for how they looked?

    I’m from Vermont and yeah when I was a kid we used lead sinkers without a second thought. We breathed it out of car exhaust without a second thought too. Today I can’t think of any behavior easier to change than throwing a poisonous element into the environment for sport.

    • ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s because of how they look? But they’re so pretty. And the sound of a loon call is one of the best sounds any animal produces. Are we missing something?

      • FirstCircle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Good question, I was just alluding to the part in the article that read

        European settlers so disliked these “ill-shap’d” birds

        but I too wonder if the birds have some other habits that people think they should die for? And the part about hunting … I’ve never heard of people hunting loons for food (? or for the feathers maybe?) so I guess shooting them would be for the fun of it and/or to reduce their numbers.