What I don’t understand is how anyone could listen to Trump complain about a Putin made claim that Ukraine attacked his residence and Trump was “mad” about it. Then Trump can turn around and say he attacked/abducted 2 leaders from another country and think it should be fine.
What he actually just did is mark Mar-A-Lago and his other properties as being eligible targets in any retaliation that comes in the future.
I, personally, would drive to the wreckage and take a huge dump on it before going on the celebration bender of a lifetime if another country had the balls to wipe Mar A Lago off the map.
Leaders have always been legitimate military targets regardless of where they are or what they’re doing. But traditionally, any attack would be targeted to minimize civilian casualties, especially to women and children and cultural buildings like churches, schools, museums, and of course hospitals and medical personnel.
What I don’t understand is how anyone could listen to Trump complain about a Putin made claim that Ukraine attacked his residence and Trump was “mad” about it. Then Trump can turn around and say he attacked/abducted 2 leaders from another country and think it should be fine.
What he actually just did is mark Mar-A-Lago and his other properties as being eligible targets in any retaliation that comes in the future.
We can all hope, right?
I, personally, would drive to the wreckage and take a huge dump on it before going on the celebration bender of a lifetime if another country had the balls to wipe Mar A Lago off the map.
I stopped long ago thinking like that - in terms of consistency - about Trump & posse. But yeah, let’s.
Leaders have always been legitimate military targets regardless of where they are or what they’re doing. But traditionally, any attack would be targeted to minimize civilian casualties, especially to women and children and cultural buildings like churches, schools, museums, and of course hospitals and medical personnel.