• LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    What I don’t understand is how anyone could listen to Trump complain about a Putin made claim that Ukraine attacked his residence and Trump was “mad” about it. Then Trump can turn around and say he attacked/abducted 2 leaders from another country and think it should be fine.

    What he actually just did is mark Mar-A-Lago and his other properties as being eligible targets in any retaliation that comes in the future.

      • AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        I, personally, would drive to the wreckage and take a huge dump on it before going on the celebration bender of a lifetime if another country had the balls to wipe Mar A Lago off the map.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Leaders have always been legitimate military targets regardless of where they are or what they’re doing. But traditionally, any attack would be targeted to minimize civilian casualties, especially to women and children and cultural buildings like churches, schools, museums, and of course hospitals and medical personnel.