• lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    If only there was some kind of hole they could put in a phone to plug your headphones into without a shitty dongle being involved… Sadly such technology remains beyond our reach.

    • P13@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I just plug my headphones directly into USB-C without a dongle for both phone and laptop. Works just as well and 3.5mm used to.

      I’m all for plugging in but I don’t really understand the outrage now that everything is super standardized.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        You can’t charge your phone and use your USB headphones at the same time, without a dongle.

        If this isn’t a use case for you, you should understand that it is a use case for others, and it’s a problem that was solved before manufacturers forced it on it. Give me two USB ports and maybe I’ll be satisfied, though I’m sure others still have a use case for 3.5mm and will still need a dongle…

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Things are in no way “super standardized”. My headphones aren’t USB. My aux jack isn’t USB. None of my audio shit plugs into USB.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Admittedly, I could be smarter and/or less sleep deprived, then maybe I wouldn’t be having trouble taking in all the technical information. So I’m not saying this is a bad article. But is there a thesis hidden somewhere (even a tl;dr, as the cool kids say)? I made it about half-way through without knowing what the actual problem is before I gave up (see above lack of smarts and sleep). I THINK it’s suboptimal audio quality? (Which, admittedly again, probability says it is, given this is about headphones)

    tl;dr: me no brain good but me interested, eli5?

    • fleck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      5 days ago

      The observation is that most USB-C to 3.5mm (“aux jack”) audio dongles are supporting high quality audio but only support the USB Full Speed (FS) data rate which is not enough for the high quality audio. This causes problems.

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Agreed, and this article is written backwards.

      Problem: Audio is a low power (relatively low data) signal that goes over wire. Audio data (not audio) sent via USB needs decoding into audio before it gets sent down the headphone wire. Implementation fails due to insufficient bandwidth. Graphs and textual details go into details about the bottlenecks.

    • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Buzzing, buttons not working, other devices not working in the same bus. I’d just read it when you’ve had some sleep

    • rabidhamster@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 days ago

      I remember it as far back as the 90’s. Usually referred to things like SCSI dongles that authorized the use of expensive software like Maya (which was ~$50k at the time), because online DRM activation wasn’t really a thing yet. Probably goes back further than that.

      • Brewchin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 days ago

        The 80s, I think, thanks to AutoDesk. AutoCAD required their DB9 serial dongle (in-line with the mouse) for the software to function.

        As you say, well before DRM was the default for everything. I thought they were an awful company for it, but little did I know how things would pan out due to the DMCA… 😒

        • rabidhamster@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Lol, tell me about it.

          And the serial dongle sounds much more sensible than requiring what amounted to a SCSI terminator, of which you could typically only have one. Need to use other software with a SCSI dongle? Shut down your machine, swap them out, and start it up again, 'cause SCSI don’t like that hot swapping.

        • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Perhaps it is an ESL thing? We were using it in the States in the 90’s to describe a hardware authenticator key on parallel port that allowed CAD software to run, in a drafting class.

          Later (00’s) i heard it used for all manner of peripheral USB accessories.

          I’m trying to imagine what the gimmick would be.

            • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              Well, English isn’t a prescriptive language, so if we just start saying “dongus” they’ll put it in the dictionary.

              Anyone got a recommendation for a good bluetooth dongus?

  • Poach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s unclear to me what this person is on about. USB type c uses alt mode for audio. The adapters should be simple wires plus a few resistors. There is no adc or dac or amplifier in the dongle…

    • dorkage@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      5 days ago

      All two dongles I have used (Google, Apple) have a DAC.

      I’m pretty sure the analog ones are the exception, not the rule.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Analog ones require the USB host to support it. USB DACs on the other hand only require the OS to support them since they just use standard USB features. That’s much more compatible.

      • Anivia@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I’m pretty sure the analog ones are the exception, not the rule.

        That is correct, and at least part of the reason for that is that most notebooks, and even many smartphones, don’t support them. DACs are so incredibly cheap nowadays that it costs the manufacturer less to put one in the adapter, than to deal with the cost of half their customers returning the adapter because it doesn’t work with their device.