fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agoNordVPN denies breach claims, says attackers have "dummy data"www.bleepingcomputer.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up194arrow-down11
arrow-up193arrow-down1external-linkNordVPN denies breach claims, says attackers have "dummy data"www.bleepingcomputer.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squareLembot_0006@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down4·8 days agoWhy would *VPN even have ANY data worth taking through breaching?
minus-squaredublet@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27arrow-down1·8 days agoThey operate a business that charges for a service, and therefore have user accounts and payment data for those accounts.
minus-squareJohn Lemmy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·8 days agoThere is at least one VPN provider (that I know of) that doesn’t record account and payment data. You can send the fee via regular post in a envelope tied to only a random numerical user ID
minus-squarePostmortal_Pop@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·8 days agoMulvad. That’s how I do it.
minus-squarea_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoBecause your previous trust is clearly misplaced. I don’t care what somebody’s TOS says, I’m going to remain skeptical.
Why would *VPN even have ANY data worth taking through breaching?
They operate a business that charges for a service, and therefore have user accounts and payment data for those accounts.
There is at least one VPN provider (that I know of) that doesn’t record account and payment data. You can send the fee via regular post in a envelope tied to only a random numerical user ID
Mulvad. That’s how I do it.
Because your previous trust is clearly misplaced.
I don’t care what somebody’s TOS says, I’m going to remain skeptical.