• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    257
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    “Open source” really isn’t the right term here, if they’re just releasing API specifications. “Open sourcing” the speakers would be releasing the source code to the software that runs on the speakers.

    Like, all of Microsoft’s libraries on Windows have a publicly-documented interface. That hardly makes them open source. Just means that people can write software that make use of them.

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      Indeed it’s misleading wording but credit where credit is due, this is far better than turning them all into e-waste. It’s not like anyone bought these with the assumption they would have any sort of official API someday, especially after seeing how Sonos handled their similar situation…

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s misleading wording by arse-technica, not Bose. The quoted wording from Nosebis correct and it looks like they’re doing the right thing. After originally announcing they would be dumb speakers, now they’ll continue to be useful and third party apps can continue to use them. Applaud Bose for doing the right thing

        Direct your Boos to arse-technica