• ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    So what specific violence do you recommend? Against whom? Where? When? Based on which historical precedent (pick just one)?

    Because you’re both very light on specifics. “[T]his is the argument that caused people to permit the Nazis” is a statement made of smoke.

    • bastion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      The specific violence is highly contextual. And it’s wise to be light on specifics, but for historical examples you can look up the history of German and Austrian resistance fighters in Germany during and prior to world war 2 if you like. Efforts both peaceful and violent had an impact and contributed to the allied victory.

      A good example would be finding specific individuals who have broken the law and killed people, but who have avoided any legal repercussion, and ensuring that there is a repercussion.

      It’s definitely not an action that should be taken wildly, or while on tilt. but we’re approaching the point of needing that kind of action.