• UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    165
    ·
    2 days ago

    The original narrative was that she was a protestor / legal observer. i.e. that she was actively engaged with the ICE activity in some capacity and that she had placed herself in harms way in the course of doing so.

    This new information reveals that she was just a normal person going about her normal business before being randomly murdered by ICE.

    Neither version says its OK to just murder someone, but the information that she was just a person in the wrong place takes even more out of the narrative that she somehow initiated the encounter at all.

    • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      2 days ago

      Neither version says its OK to just murder someone,

      That’s the issue though and why this is important. The right is using this specific talking point to attempt to justify her murder. This shuts down that narrative immediately and forces people to wrestle with their own lack of humanity.