With the Steam Frame and Steam Machine launching with SteamOS Linux this year, we’re going to again see a nice boost for Flatpaks and desktop Linux overall.

Linux has, historically, been quite messy when it comes to software distribution. We have various distribution-specific packaging formats like .deb (Debian / Ubuntu), .rpm (Fedora) and the list just goes on and on. Canonical also went their own way with Ubuntu for the likes of Snap, but the real winner is going to end up being Flatpak and the main Flathub store.

  • Jestzer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Valve not showing the price of these is a pretty strong indicator that these are not going to be generously priced, which is why I’m not allowing myself to be excited about them. I think that they won’t be widely adopted enough to make a large impact on Linux as a result of the price.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Valve showed the price of the Steam Deck the day it was revealed, so I agree. This thing’s gonna be $700 if we’re lucky, which is way too high for mass adoption. Even the $400 Steam Deck entry price is gone now.

  • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    I expect the machine to sell much less than the deck, and even less than the frame.

    Personally I’ll get the frame, I can’t justify full price for the machine (unless it’s under 500, which won’t happen with RAM as it is priced)

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I was hoping to see a price on the Frame but I imagine with RAM prices going apeshit they’re putting that off for a bit.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    mmm yes, I too like duplicated dependancies in the push for a unified distro.

    Realistically that’s my only complaint about flatpak. I have 7 or 8 flatpaks installed on my system, and I think 4 seperate gnome environments installed as dependancies to them. It’s so bloaty

    • illusionist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a feature to have multiple environments. Otherwise all apps would have to stay on an old version with the lowest common dependency versions.

    • PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      As another person said, having multiple versions of dependencies is part of the draw. Also, Flatpak does allow for deduplication of dependencies when multiple applications require the same version.

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Who doesn’t like bloated dependencies, it’s like you get more software per software

      • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Luckily SSD prices are going down. \S

        In fairness, I have enough to value more the convenience than the extra size. Might not agree if I had a small drive

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I agree. I wish Flatpak used a proper package manager. You install one Flatpak and you need the entire freedesktop sdk even if you use a fifth of it. Install a second Flatpak and maybe do it again.

    • evol@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      bit of a hyperbole but if we didn’t stick to this shared dependency model for applications for so long we would already have the year of the linux desktop