• ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I’m not a fan of China (government)… at all. But when I check all the technological breakthrough they are getting in these last years while the US was inflating his fucking ai-bubble. Objectively, they are getting so far ahead is not even funny. At least Europe is on a good track themself.

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      China is now the world leader in science by most metrics (largest proportion of the top 1% most cited papers, most publications to prestigious journals, etc). It makes sense, with their high population and their government willing to fund research. I’m guessing their culture is much less anti-intellectual than the West too, especially the US.

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Nothing they’ve done in recent years is ground breaking.

      Room temperature superconductors? Fake.

      Self-driving bus using painted lanes for navigation? We have trains and trams for that.

      Thorium reactor? Germany had one in the 80s, shut it down because it was expensive, there’s around 20 different projects happening in Europe and North America to make it more efficient.

      The fusion reactor from the article? They maybe potentially hypothetically achieved one breakthrough of the dozens still needed to make fusion viable.

      Etc., etc.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The overwhelming majority of their so called breakthroughs are just media fluff pieces though. Their sources are more and more often AI generated studies and their supposed advancements aren‘t going anywhere a lot of the time. By the time people start asking questions and want to know more details they have already prepared another story for you to be impressed by. It‘s shock and awe.

      • Derpgon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’ve been seeing articles like these for the past at least 10 years, it is always “New China brrakthrough, can make drinkable water from enriched uranium” or some shit. It is never scalable, sustainable, or usable, and is never really widely, used or adopted. It is always technology, pharmaceutics, construction, or energy related.

        They like to fake their image to the world and have been trying for very long. The only thing they succeeded at larger scale is oppresion, tracking of people, and selling knockoffs. Of course, mass manufacturing cannot be omitted.

    • nucleative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’m no China expert but I lived In South China for a while between 2016 and 2024. The Chinese people I know are mostly hardworking, very motivated to succeed, and well capitalized. In their major cities you might be surprised to learn normal guys who earn half what you do are living a higher quality of life than you are, in terms of access to technology.

      Their government is no doubt using uncouth methods to give their country unfair advantages. They don’t play well with others.

      But holy shit there is one thing this Chinese government is doing well: effectively driving growth with targeted investments in the economy. They have been focused on that one mission consistently for a long time.

      While democracies fuck around trying to decide if they should tax themselves to build public transportation, China installs 10 new ultrafast subway lines in just a few years in every big city. Covers the country in a network of high-speed rail. Drives the price of shipping goods around the country to almost nothing.

      A kind of monoparty like China has is very likely a net negative when we look at world history, but for moments of time, if it’s the right one, amazing things can happen.

      • RightEdofer@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Party’s don’t have to be part of democracy though. Nonpartisan democracy might more achievable for China than the west currently as the size of their single party continues to grow. Though I kinda doubt there is a lot of appetite for it. I’m a firm believer in democracy but it’s hard to look at the hyper polarization of today’s parties as beneficial in any way. Especially in the simple two party American system.

        • IronBird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          tax billionaires out of existence and the polarization will solve itself in short order

      • phx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        14 hours ago

        One thing I’ve been impressed with China for is moving towards greener technologies. They’re a leader in solar, their EV’s are apparently very good (not that I can get one here to verify that), and they’re pretty dogged in their pursuit of nuclear energy.

        Meanwhile USA is apparently still in “let’s overturn regimes and take over other countries for the oil companies” mode

      • BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Hey, Americans are hard working too. Some work 3 jobs just to make ends meet.

        The US government threatens other countries with tariffs and sanctions to give American companies unfair advantage. Is that not using unclouth methods?

        • Poojabber@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Americans are hardworking too, but the American government is not actively working to support those hardworking Americans, which is the difference… the average American is working their ass off to earn less than ever to add wealth to the small percentage of ultra wealthy in power here. There are sanctions, tarriffs, and subsidies here, but the vast majority of them benefit the top of the pyramid, while leaving the majority to struggle.

          • BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            12 hours ago

            The US government does everything in its power to make the wealthy even more wealthy. But hey, worker empowerment is communism.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You should consider effects of scale.

        With the size of China it’s simply easier to do “targeted investments”.

        They are almost big enough for autarky with modern technologies and conveniences.

    • thedarkfly@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      What frustrates me is that China is indeed leading so much technological development on energy, but the amount of coal being burnt is just not budging… Please, China. Make the transition already.

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That’s because 90% of these articles about their technological breakthroughs are bullsht.

      • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s a bit two sided I believe. The energy demand is increasing, so there’s indeed more coal being burnt.

        But at the same time, the share of clean energy sources compared to coal is also getting bigger and bigger.

        So it’s not all bad. Mostly seems the demand for energy is growing too fast to decently transition, let’s hope they can catch up and get rid of coal as soon as possible.

        • thedarkfly@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah, I hope that the renewables will continue exponentially… I agree that the growing share of renewables in the mix is awesome, but in the end what matters is each ton of CO2 emitted. And we’re not going in the right direction :(

    • Avicenna@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yea they are probably quite ahead in about %80 of critical tech. Not only that but they also seem to be investing quite alot in sustainable tech, public transport tech, medicine etc. I wouldn’t be surprised at all if center of attraction for science shifts from US to China in near future.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Given all the cuts to science, deportation of scientists, and blocking student researchersin the past year alone, I’d claim the US deserves half the credit for China’s impending science ascendancy

        We’re not losing the competition, we’re throwing a tantrum and scattering the game pieces …… somehow thinking that’s the same as winning

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        If all those stories from China from the last decade are true then science has already moved to China long ago. But it hasn‘t. Really makes you think, doesn‘t it?

        • Avicenna@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Not sure, even like ten years ago when I was doing my PhD lots of students in prominent US universities like Carnegie Mellon were going to China to intern in HEP colliders.

    • BaronVonBort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Thats the thing that truly pisses me off about the US govt right now.

      Ok, China is doing all these things and we’re losing our advantage? Do what we did during the space race and pump cash into innovation, science, and research.

      But noooo we do the polar opposite and also drive scientists out of the country because they can get funding elsewhere.

      • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Hey, at least they’ve got evangelism down to a science. I’m sure militant devotion to [the parts they like from] the Bible will pay back dividends down the road. Who needs the disciplined and organized pursuit of modern science in earnest when some old book written by long-dead humans claiming to speak for a supreme being says it has all the answers (many of which involve smite-based solutions)?

      • ms.lane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Do what we did during the space race and pump cash into innovation, science, and research.

        Oh they are. For AI. Instead of scrambling to Fusion, they’re putting the money into generating nudes of celebrities.

    • febra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You don’t have to like the government, but they’re the sole reason China is slowly starting to take the lead in science and engineering. These are the fruits of marxism-leninism, whether you like it or not.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        China is not Marxist-leninist lmao. They have a market economy.

        State capitalism is not the same as Marxism.

      • ekZepp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Sure, if you like to compare corrupt, totalitarian states, have fun. Don’t forget russia.

        • BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 hours ago

          People of the world including Europe, South America, middle East and Asia feel safer from Russia and China than America.

            • BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              You’re more likely to lose Greenland to America than Ukraine to Russia. Ukraine isn’t even part of the EU and it is a former USSR territory.

            • BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              You’re more likely to lose Greenland to America than Ukraine to Russia. Ukraine isn’t even part of the EU and it is a former USSR territory.

              • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                8 hours ago

                and it is a former USSR territory

                So is half the EU. What’s this got to do with anything?

                • BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Greenland is more Europe than Ukraine because Greenland has been part of Denmark for over 1000 years but Ukraine is new. But It’s more likely that America will conquer Greenland than Russia conquers Ukraine.

                  • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 hours ago

                    Calling Ukraine “new” just shows how ignorant you are. Kievan Rus has been around since 11th century. Ukraine is older than russia by 3-4 hundred years.