• AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why? It totally sucks and is ruining the world in almost every corner. Fuck AI with a sharp stick.

    • fxdave@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      2 months ago

      It does work for me. I use it and it is helping a lot.

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Unless you are working on some engineering or scientific problem that needs these models to get to a solution, even if it works for you, it’s still a waste of energy.

        • fxdave@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I had heavy problems to solve. Claude Opus could solve some. I could solve them too, but with claude it’s faster. One recent problem would take around two days if I would do it, but claude did it in half an hour.

          I’m not advertising claude, if it gives bullshit response I turn it off instantly. Like with every tool, you need to learn to use it.

          Another example: In the app I work on, there’s a huge list of city integration files. I had a loose set of specifications for a new city, and with claude I could roll out a new prototype in no time. It saved me about a month of work.

          It’s expensive and energy hungry for sure.

            • fxdave@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              These are not deadlines. A task takes what it takes. We only provide an estimation.

            • fxdave@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              If I am the tankie you must be the lgbtq femboy. There’s nothing wrong with it. We are here for different reasons :D.

              Stereotypes aside, aren’t you using one?

              • Image processing, (e.g.: Camera enhancement, gimp, rawtherapee are full with AIs)
              • sound processing, (noise reduction, etc…)
              • text processing
                • reasoning models for programming, math
                • LLMs for grammar checking / searching when I don’t know the keyword / researching when I’m not interested that much about the topic, but I want multiple sources / getting common knowledge I don’t know yet.
              • Recently I tried 3D asset generation. Damn it gave me a perfect character model. But it’s not for work so I’m not gonna pay for it.
              • etc…

              They are useful.

      • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        It sometimes works for me. But the old computer truth of garbage in garbage out still applies. It’s got the world’s garbage to sift through.

      • Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        2 months ago

        If everyone’s just gonna down vote this I’m not sure there’s any room for understanding in this crowd

        • oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          Looks like you’re the one without understanding.

          Even if I grant that there’s a few super helpful uses that are good for humanity (and I don’t grant that at all), it’s still actively harmful to the other 99.3% of us.

          Unless you’re saying it can end cancer, keep us young forever, provide literally limitless energy, and instantaneous networking, all while giving us potential to explore the universe, then it’s still not worth what it’s costing us RIGHT NOW.

          Until you can make it do any of that without being owned or pushed by CEOs for money, then it will never be worth it.

          Sure it could be useful if it didn’t cost anything and did everything, but that’s about as far as I believe it.

          It should stay in the research and theory phase until it’s perfect. And it never will be, hence most people attitudes on it. No. 00000001% change of finding a good execution of a use is worth what it is costing us to try out.

          • Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            My point is the group here has made it quite clear there’s no room for honest discussion. And that’s pretty weak.

            • oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              There would be, if it was any less black and white. Show something worth discussing and people would jump at that conversation.

              Given that they’re doesn’t seen to be much coming up in that vein, there’s no room. Room would be made of there was something to make room for.

        • athatet@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Billionaire tech bros stole all of the information on the internet and are using to make CSAM. it’s making all our energy prices increase and using up all of our water.

          If you really can’t understand why people aren’t into that I really don’t know what else to tell you.

          • Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            You really just prove my point. Someone posted they found a good use for it and you just want to scream at them. That’s not a discussion.

            • athatet@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Except that no one screamed at them. Everyone posted a reasonable explanation as to why ai is a slop of shit. If that’s not a discussion then I don’t know what to tell you.

  • slaacaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    just one more slop bro. I promise bro just one more slop and it’ll fix everything bro. bro, just one more slop. please just one more, one more slop and we can fix this whole problem bro, bro cmon just give me one more slop i promise bro, bro bro please! just need one more slop

  • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    According to Huang, considering the potential existential risks of unleashing AI on society may do more harm than good. “It’s not helpful. It’s not helpful to people. It’s not helpful to the industry. It’s not helpful to society. It’s not helpful to the governments,” he said. He particularly took issue with other people in the industry going to the government and asking for regulation and mandatory safeguards. “You have to ask yourself, you know, what is the purpose of that narrative and what are their intentions,” he asked rhetorically. “Why are they talking to governments about these things to create regulations to suffocate startups?”

    You don’t have to ask yourself that because it’s common sense. He’s being disingenuous about AI’s potential to harm society, and stating the intent is to suffocate startups…they’re not making a new instant messaging client. I want to smack him upside the head.

  • Ghostwurm@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s destroying our economy, our ecology, our politics, our society. What’s not to like?

    • Zacryon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      To be fair, capitalism is inherently incompatible with advancements in robotics and AI. Doesn’t mean the technology is destroying the economics and society. The socio-economic system was already broken to begin with.

  • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    People: AI is cool, I could use it to get my work done faster.

    Billionaires: Fuck you, we’ll just replace you completely.

    But yeah, let’s stop complaining.

  • BigTrout75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    Every f’ing day for the last two years I have had AI stores shoved in my face. Now I’m suppose to be happy about it?