• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This, absolutely, yes

    We need to stop allowing manufacturers to force people to throw away well working products

    To add to that, it must be prohibited to make products that are designed to fail early

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yes. If the source is so important to them then they should have to continue supporting it.

  • ambitiousslab@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Now, I’m not asking companies to open-source their entire codebase. That’s unrealistic when an app is tied to a larger platform. What I am asking for: publish a basic GitHub repo with the hardware specs and connection protocols. Let the community build their own apps on top of it.

    I agree with this. I think the most important thing is not necessarily the original company releasing their proprietary code (although that would be nice), but it being easy (and legal!) for hackers to reverse engineer and/or build on top of the platform.

    The irony is that, since most such products will have some GPL’d code in there somewhere, most products already basically have such a requirement, thanks to the section requiring complete corresponding source including installation instructions. Hopefully, the Vizio case will establish the precedent that users, as well as copyright holders, can take action against such companies.