• Lembot_0006@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I would still like to see an explanation of why it is bad. Regardless of who will provide that explanation :)

    • fartsparkles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Bad for Meta. They wasted a lot of time, money, manpower etc.

      Edit: I’m just answering the person’s question. I hate Meta - I don’t have Facebook and I don’t have a Quest.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Also kind of bad for VR that they bought Oculus and buried it under a ton of stuff no one asked for and will likely kill it entirely for failing to be the everyman’s gateway to socialization like they strangely imagined it to be.

        The true target market for Oculus is relatively niche, but probably could have sustained a more modest oculus. Meta’s demands exceed what that market can give them.

        Biggest hope for VR future right now is Steam Frame.

      • skribe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They could have bought second life a hundred times over and at least had something that worked (albeit poorly).

    • zecg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I would still like to see an explanation of why it is bad. Regardless of who will provide that explanation :)

      Because they have Occulus’ locked up in their basement and gimmick du jour is worse, now instead of just having a headset where you have to use their account and see ads for their shitty corpo vr chat every time you login you’ll have a mandatory llm paperclip learning your habits and shilling 24/7