It also, consequently, makes the advertisements which they show to you far less valuable. So this feature is not widely advertised.

    • Billegh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      They do. When enabled, they don’t use it to serve you ads based on those things.

      They still collect and sell it. They just don’t show you ads based on it.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Google says it doesn’t sell your personal info to third parties. While you would be well within your reason to suspect this isn’t true, it is actually legally relevant because it means, as a consequence, Google doesn’t provide a “do not sell my personal information” opt-out link which would otherwise be required by California law (where Google is headquartered).

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          No, selling your personal info would be detrimental to their business model. It would feed their competitor’s databases. They sell aggregate data, though.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Don’t have an account there. Block ads. Simple as that.

    No, you don’t need gmail. Every other E-mail service has also a web-interface that sucks.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nah fuck them, they can mail my disroot acct, or I don’t have an email and they can call me, anything else send a note home with the kid, free courier. It’s not like gmail is incompatible with email, add my addr to the mailing list and quit crying.

  • melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It also, consequently, makes the advertisements which they show to you *far* less valuable. So this feature is not widely advertised.

    I do wonder how much more effective surveillance capitalism-style ads are compared to ads like what DuckDuckGo has that are based on what you’re searching for right now, or ads based on the content being viewed. I’d personally be more likely to click on an ad based on my current search or content I’m viewing where it’s directly obvious how they know my interest, as opposed to seeing a creepy ad on a random website where they magically know I recently considered buying new shoes.

    • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Turning off the targeted ads settings indeed prevents Google from showing you overtly targeted ads. It makes no claim that it prevents Google from harvesting the same data that is used to target ads

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yea, but then you get an absolute fuck tonne of gambling or ai girlfriend ads because they will not limit their advertising scope.

  • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    What? I use locally hosted searxng, ublock origin, librewolf, noscript, chameleon, libredirect, a massive no AI block list, and a self hosted pihole with unbound DNS resolution. I use yt-dlp with sponsor-block via a self hosted invidious instance and “subscribe” via RSS feed when I need to watch something from youtube.

    On mobile I use grapheneos, fdroid, and tubular.

    Wtf is a google and wtf is an advertisement?

  • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    The joke is on them as I am the sort of person who does not see the ads. I mean I see them of course, but they extremely rarely make me interested. Like it is very rare that I see an ad and click on it. This the case on all platforms and I am not blocking my data. I wonder what % of people are like me as I cannot be the only one? I am not even saying that there could not be more ads I would be interested in, but clearly the tech no matter how advanced they say it is, is not very sophisticated as of yet.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The only ads I ever click on are when I search something like “brother dcp-l2550w toner” and the first result is an ad for Staples where I was going to buy the thing anyway. Even if I saw an ad for that exact toner and said “ah, that reminds me I need more toner,” I’d still not click that ad but rather go search as described because I do not click ads.

      There have been times I’ve been so annoyed by a company’s ads that instead of buying their product I go with their direct competitor out of pure spite (if I needed something like the item in question, ykwim).

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Usually a picture with text, that lies to you and tries to manipulate you into buying something.

      They also spy on you, so the ad-provider can figure out your secret interests, to better manipulate you.

  • mvilain@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve turned off all the history tracking on my google account for years. I’m sure somewhere in their data lake, the data exists. They just don’t make it available to see on the web. I think this probably because when presented with a subpoena, they seems to have the data. Shocking, I know.